Jewish Talmudic Quotes - Facts Are Facts

Jewish Talmudic Quotes - Facts Are FactsFrom Acharya S

7-26-9

Talmudic Quotes

 

The decisions of the Talmud are words of the living God. Jehovah himself asks the opinions of earthly rabbis when there are difficult affairs in heaven.

 

Rabbi Menachen, Comments for the Fifth Book

 

Jehovah himself in heaven studies the Talmud, standing: he has such respect for that book.

 

Tractate Mechilla/Me'ilah

 

R. Johanan said: A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death, for it is written, Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance; it is our inheritance, not theirs. Then why is this not included in the Noachian laws? -- On the reading morasha [an inheritance] he steals it; on the reading me'orasah [betrothed], he is guilty as one who violates a betrothed maiden, who is stoned. An objection is raised: R. Meir used to say. Whence do we know that even a heathen who studies the Torah is as a High Priest? From the verse, [Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments:] which, if man do, he shall live in them. Priests, Levites, and Israelites are not mentioned, but men: hence thou mayest learn that even a heathen who studies the Torah is as a High Priest! -- That refers to their own seven laws.

 

Sanhedrin 59a

 

To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.

 

Libbre David 37

 

A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them.

 

Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17

 

We beg Thee, O Lord, indict Thy wrath on the nations not believing in Thee, and not calling on Thy name. Let down Thy wrath on them and inflict them with Thy wrath. Drive them away in Thy wrath and crush them into pieces. Take away, O Lord, all bone from them. In a moment indict all disbelievers. Destroy in a moment all foes of Thy nation. Draw out with the root, disperse and ruin unworthy nations. Destroy them! Destroy them immediately, in this very moment!

 

Prayer said on the eve of Passover (Pranajtis: Christianus in Talmudae Judeorum, quotations from: Synagoga Judaica)

 

The Feast of Tabernacles is the period when Israel triumphs over the other people of the world. That is why during this feast we seize the loulab and carry it as a trophy to show that we have conquered all other peoples, known as "populace"...

 

Zohar, Toldoth Noah 63b

 

When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves.

 

Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D

 

Resh Lakish said: He who is observant of fringes will be privileged to be served by two thousand eight hundred slaves, for it is said, Thus saith the Lord of hosts: In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold, out of all the languages of the nations shall even take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you, etc.

 

Mas. Shabbath 31b

 

On the house of the Goy [Goy means unclean, and is the disparaging term for a non-Jew] one looks as on the fold of cattle.

 

Tosefta, Tractate Erubin VIII

 

When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it.

 

Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156

 

If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth.

 

Choschen Hamm 388, 15

 

Happy will be the lost of Israel, whom the Holy One, blessed be He, has chosen from amongst the Goyim, of whom the Scriptures say: "Their work is but vanity, it is an illusion at which we must laugh; they will all perish when God visits them in His wrath." At the moment when the Holy One, blessed be He, will exterminate all the Goyim of the world, Israel alone will subsist, even as it is written: "The Lord alone will appear great on that day!...

 

Zohar, Vayshlah 177b

 

That the Jewish nation is the only nation selected by God, while all the remaining ones are contemptible and hateful.

 

That all property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which consequently is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general.

 

A Jew may rob a Goy, he may cheat him over a bill, which should not be perceived by him, otherwise the name of God would become dishonoured.

 

Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat, 348

 

R. Hanina said: If a heathen smites a Jew, he is worthy of death; for it is written, And he looked this way and that way, and when he saw that there was no man, he slew the Egyptian. [Ex. 2:12] R. Hanina also said: He who smites an Israelite on the jaw, is as though he had thus assaulted the Divine Presence; for it is written, one who smiteth man [i.e. an Israelite] attacketh the Holy One.

 

Sanhedrin 58b

[In other words, if a non-Jew kills a Jew, the non-Jew can be killed. Punching an Israelite is akin to assaulting God. (But killing a non-Jew is NOT like assaulting God.]

 

If a goy killed a goy or a Jew he is responsible, but if a Jew killed a goy he is not responsible.

 

Tosefta, Aboda Zara, VIII, 5

 

Has it not been taught: "With respect to robbery -- if one stole or robbed or [seized] a beautiful woman, or [committed] similar offences, if [these were perpetrated] by one Cuthean ["Cuthean" or "Samaritan" = goy/gentile/heathen/non-Jew] against another, [the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an Israelite by a Cuthean, but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained?" But if robbery is a capital offence, should not the Tanna have taught: He incurs a penalty? -- Because the second clause wishes to state, "but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained," therefore the former clause reads, "[theft of an Israelite by a Cuthean] must not be kept." But where a penalty is incurred, it is explicitly stated, for the commencing clause teaches: "For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty?"

 

Sanhedrin 57a

[Translation: A Jew may rob a Goy, but a Goy may not rob a Jew. If a Goy murders another Goy or a Jew, he should be killed, but a Jew will not be incur the death penalty for killing a non-Jew.]

 

Kill the Goyim by any means possible.

 

Choshen Ha'mishpat 425:50

 

Everyone who sheds the blood of the impious [non-Jews] is as acceptable to God as he who offers a sacrifice to God.

 

Yalkut 245c

 

Extermination of the Christians is a necessary sacrifice.

 

Zohar, Shemoth

 

Tob shebbe goyyim harog - Even the best of the Goyim (Gentiles) should be killed.

 

Soferim 15, Rule 10

[NB: Hoffman says, "This passage is not from the Soncino edition but is from the original Hebrew of the Babylonian Talmud as quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, 'Gentile,' (p. 617)." Another source says this passage is at Avodah Zara 26b. We have not been able to verify any of these references. It does not seem to be at Avodah Zara 26b of the Soncino edition.]

 

What is [the meaning of] Mount Sinai? The mountain whereon there descended hostility [sin'ah ] toward idolaters [non-Jews].

 

Shabbath 89a

 

The same has been taught as follows: If the ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite [non-Jew] there is no liability, but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite... the payment is to be in full, as it is said: He stood and measured the earth, he beheld and drove asunder the nations [Gentiles], and again, He shined forth from Mount Paran...implying that from Paran he exposed their money to Israel.

 

Baba Kama 38a

[Trans: The property of the Israelite is more valuable than that of the Gentile. Mount Paran refers to Deut. 33:2, where God offered the law to the nations (Gentiles), who rejected it. The money of the Gentiles is available to the Israelites.]

 

ONE SHOULD NOT PLACE CATTLE IN HEATHENS' INNS, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF IMMORAL PRACTICE WITH THEM. A WOMAN SHOULD NOT BE ALONE WITH THEM, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF LEWDNESS, NOR SHOULD A MAN BE ALONE WITH THEM, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF SHEDDING BLOOD. . .

 

Why then should we not leave female animals alone with female heathens? -- Said Mar 'Ukba b. Hama: Because heathens frequent their neighbours' wives, and should one by chance not find her in, and find the cattle there, he might use it immorally. You may also say that even if he should find her in he might use the animal, as a Master has said: Heathens prefer the cattle of Israelites to their own wives, for R. Johanan said: When the serpent came unto Eve he infused filthy lust into her.

 

Avodah Zarah 22a-b

 

He who pours the oil of anointing over cattle or vessels is not guilty; if over heathens or the dead, he is not guilty. The law relating to cattle and vessels is right, for it is written: Upon the flesh of man [adam] shall it not be poured; and cattle and vessels are not man. Also with regard to the dead, [it is plausible] that he is exempt, since after death one is called corpse and not man. But why is one exempt in the case of heathens; are they not in the category of adam?-No, it is written: And ye my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are adam [man]: Ye are called adam but heathens are not called 'adam. But is it not written: And the persons [adam] were sixteen thousand? -- Because it is used in opposition to cattle. But is it not written: And should I not have pity on Nineveh [that great city, wherein are more than six score thousand persons [adam]?--This too is used in opposition to cattle.

 

Mas. K'rithoth 6b

[This passage refers to anointing with oil. "Heathens," i.e., Gentiles, are not "adam" or man but are equated with cattle]

 

An objection was raised: And the persons were sixteen thousand!--This is due to [the mention of] cattle. Wherein are more than six-score thousand persons that cannot discern between their right and their left hand!--This is due [to the mention of] cattle.

 

Mas. Yevamoth 61b

[Again non-Jews are referred to as "cattle."]

 

All Israelites will have a part in the future world... The Goyim, at the end of the world will be handed over to the angel Duma and sent down to hell.

 

Zohar, Shemoth, Toldoth Noah, Lekh-Lekha

 

Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.

 

Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L

 

Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human beings.

 

Schulchan Oruch, Orach Chaim 14, 20, 32, 33, 39

 

A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.

 

Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348

 

A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl.

 

Gad. Shas. 2:2

 

A boy-goy after nine years and one day old, and a girl after three years and one day old, are considered filthy.

 

Pereferkowicz, Talmud t.v., p. 11

 

Raba stated: With reference to the Rabbinical statement that [legally] an Egyptian [Gentile] has no father, it must not be imagined that this is due to [the Egyptians'] excessive indulgence in carnal gratification, owing to which it is not known [who the father was], but that if this were known it is to be taken into consideration; but [the fact is] that even if this is known it is not taken into consideration.... Thus it may be inferred that the All Merciful declared their children to be legally fatherless, for [so indeed it is also] written, Whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses.

 

Yevamoth 98a

[Trans.: A non-Jew is "legally fatherless," regardless of whether or not the father is known. Gentile children are essentially asses and horses, i.e., animals.]

 

[The daughters of the heathens] should be considered as in the state of <http://jewish.com/askarabbi/askarabbi/askr4942.htm>niddah [separation?] from their cradle...

 

Avodah Zarah 36b

 

They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it should cause defilement by seminal emission so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with him.... It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl [communicates defilement] from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux. This is obvious!

 

Avodah Zarah 36b-37a

 

R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition [intercourse], and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; [if a niddah] she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon [a person afflicted with gonorrhoea].

 

Sanhedrin 55b

 

Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that.24 (24) I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.

 

Sanhedrin 54b

 

Raba said. It means this: When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this [three years old], it is as if one puts the finger into the eye; but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown-up woman he makes her as 'a girl who is injured by a piece of wood.'...

 

Kethuboth 11b

[This debate concerns whether or not someone is a virgin. Virginity is prized above all, such that it is believed that a girl under the age of three will regain her virginity, even if a man has had intercourse with her. (Fn. 7 says, in regard to putting "the finger into the eye": "I.e., tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.") Since virginity is prized above all, one could assume that this conclusion has allowed grown men to have sex with little girls with immunity. A grown-up woman is not deflowered by having sex with a small boy, however, since he is only like a "piece of wood."]

 

It was taught: R. Judah used to say, A man is bound to say the following three blessings daily: "[Blessed art thou...] who hast not made me a heathen," ".... who hast not made me a woman"; and "... who hast not made me a brutish man." R. Aha b. Jacob once overhead his son saying "[Blessed art thou...] who hast not made me a brutish man," whereupon he said to him, "And this too!" Said the other, "Then what blessing should I say instead?" [He replied,]...h who hast not made me a slave." And is not that the same as a woman? - a slave is more contemptible.

 

Menachoth 43b-44a

[A "prayer" or "benediction" to be said by a Jewish man every day: "Thank God for not making me a Gentile, a woman or a slave."]

 

Do not save Goyim in danger of death.

 

Show no mercy to the Goyim.

 

Hilkkoth Akum X1

 

A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine which a Gentile has touched, because the touch has made the wine unclean.

 

Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah, 122

 

And he who desires that none of his vows made during the year shall be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, 'Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null.1 [HIS VOWS ARE THEN INVALID,] PROVIDING THAT HE REMEMBERS THIS AT THE TIME OF THE VOW.

 

Nedarim 23b

[Essentially the "Kol Nidre" prayer said every year at Yom Kippur. Fn. 1 says: "This may have provided a support for the custom of reciting Kol Nidre (a formula for dispensation of vows) prior to the Evening Service of the Day of Atonement (Ran.). The context makes it perfectly obvious that only vows, where the maker abjures benefit from aught, or imposes an interdict of his own property upon his neighbour, are referred to. Though the beginning of the year (New Year) is mentioned here, the Day of Atonement was probably chosen on account of its great solemnity. But Kol Nidre as part of the ritual is later than the Talmud, and, as seen from the following statement about R. Huna h. Hinena, the law of revocation in advance was not made public."

Truth About the Talmud

9.06.2010

Judaism’s Holiest Book

http://talmudical.blogspot.ca/

Click here: Anti-goyimitic bigotry is the issue suppressed by the press and the professors

TWO MAIN POINTS OF MICHAEL HOFFMAN’S RESEARCH

1. Judaism’s hermeneutic of concealment: The sacred texts Sifra, Mishnah, Gemara and Midrash are deceptive foils for rabbinic Judaism’s mission of seeking to pair extra-scriptural traditions with passages from the Bible; giving neutral words a Talmudic meaning, and fabricating derashot (doctrine presented in the form of homilies) that have no logical connection to Biblical verses, thereby throwing fidelity to the integrity of the Old Testament to the wind. True Christians acknowledge the integrity of pshat (the literal meaning of the Biblical text). By insisting that Biblical interpretations be in strict harmony with the text, Christians differ radically and markedly from rabbinic Judaism.

2.  Our critics assert that the sacred rabbinic texts do not constitute law (Halakhah) but only commentary and debate. The truth is very different: Halakhah is made up of the traditions found in the rabbinic texts. Those texts as a whole comprise the Oral Law, what Josephus termed, paradôsis (“tradition”). Rabbinic law is grounded in the traditions of men, just as Jesus said (cf. Mark 7; Matthew 15). Those traditions consist of extra-Biblical superstitions and occultism, self-worship, racist hatred for non-Jews and sheer nonsense.

Israeli citizen Yossi Gurvitz, a former Talmud (yeshiva) student reveals the racism, homicide and child molestation-advocacy in the Babylonian Talmud and subsequent authoritative rabbinic legal texts authored by Rabbi Moses Maimonides and Rabbi Joseph Karo (“Shulchan Aruch”). He reveals Judaism’s sympathy for Islam and its undying hatred for Christianity.

Testimony of Yossi Gurvitz, July 15, 2012

_______________

Rabbinic laws intended for access by Judaic persons only, teach that goyim (gentiles) are malevolent. For this reason, the goyim are grouped together with those categories of criminals and transgressors who cannot act as a witness in a court (Shulhan Arukh: Hoshen Mishpat 34).

When the opportunity to save a Judaic human life (pikuah nefesh) conflicts with the observance of the Sabbath, saving the Judaic life takes precedence. However, rabbinic legal authorities distinguish between the obligation to save a Judaic life on the Sabbath and the life of a goy. Israel Meir Kagan (1838–1933), the halachic authority known as the Chofetz Chaim (a.ka. the Hafetz Hayyim), condemned the behavior of any Judaic physician who did not discriminate between Jews and non-Jews. Concerning Judaic physicians, Rabbi Kagan wrote, “...to treat a non-Jew...there is no authority for them to do so” (Mishneh Berurah: O.H. 330). [The authority of Rabbi Kagan's Mishnah Berurah, was assessed by Simcha Fishbane in The Encyclopedia of Judaism, which states, "His greatest work, which remains the strongest influence on Orthodox practice today and whose authority is considered final, is Mishnah Berurah (1884-1907), in six volumes”].

As Yossi Gurvitz reveals in the preceding videotaped testimony,exceptions to these bigoted rabbinic laws are permitted where Judaics are in subjection to the goyim and where news of Judaism's discrimination toward, and second class status of, the goyim, would cause an uprising of "potential animosity" (mishum eivah) toward Judaics. 

Therefore, to avoid a rebellion by the goyim, devious exceptions to the rabbinic law are made in public for the sake of pacifying (mipnei darkhei shalom) gullible goyim.  It is to these cosmetic exceptions, formulated for dissemination to inquisitive goyim who inquire about the nature of Judaism, that reference is made when Judaism attempts to defend itself from documented charges by objective scholars, regarding racism and bigotry toward non-Judaics in the religion of Judaism’s recondite rabbinic texts.

Where Judaic supremacy reigns supreme however (“Where ‘ Israel’ is mighty”), such as in the Israeli state, no such diplomatic niceties need be observed, and the full force of Talmudic/rabbinic halacha, with its institutionalized  contempt for, and discrimination toward non-Judaics, can be fully exerted. 

— Michael Hoffman, St. Patrick’s Day, 2015

_______________________

"...there are no Jews to be met with who adhere to the Old Bible without Talmud-Traditions ...the word Talmud (which makes so great a Noise in the World) it may suffice to observe, that by a sort of Metonymy, it signifies the Book containing the main Doctrines of the Jews...For it is very observable, that the Talmud is oftener brought in Vindication of their religion, than Moses, the Prophets, and Holy Writings: insomuch that they make it, and not the Old Bible, the touchstone of their doctrine, and that into which they resolve the decision of all their cases…the Talmud of Babylon...this later hath obtain’d public honor and belief among them: and at this day is universally received as the authentic body of their Law. 

"The first among Christians who took more solemn cognizance of the Talmud, was Justinian the Emperor, who about the 551 year of Christ, gave Toleration to the Jews to read the Sacred Bible in their synagogues in the Greek Tongue; but utterly prohibited them the reading of the Mishnah, as being neither adjoyned to the Sacred Books, nor delivered from above to the Prophets; but a mere invention of earthly men, who had nothing of Heaven in them. ...the Mishnah Torah was composed out of the kabbalistics and anagogics of the Jews...allegorical interpretations, pretended to be derived from Moses. When the Jews were setled in Italy and France, the bishops of Rome began to take severe cognizance of the Talmud. For Pope Innocent IV. commanded all the copies thereof that could be found in France to be burned, because it contained manifest blasphemies against God, Christ, and the Virgin Mary, inextricable abuses, erroneous and unheard-of fooleries.'

— Lancelot Addison (1632-1703), The present State of the Jews(more particularly relating to those in Barbary) wherein is contained an exact account of their customs, secular and religious : to which is annexed a summary discourse of the Misna, Talmud, and Gemara (London: Printed by J.C. for William Crooke and to be sold by John Courtney, 1675), pp. 239-240; 244; 248-249.

Judaic “Sex Guru” follows Talmudic not Biblical law

____________________

“For the true Deity of the Jews is not Yahweh, but the Jewish people itself.”
— Miguel de Unamuno
____________________
"Israeli society has been unable and unwilling to overcome an exclusivist ethno-religious nationalism that privileges Jewish citizens..." Mairav Zonszein, New York Times, Sept. 26, 2014
Slaughter Palestinians and it’s minimized.

Attack Israelis and it's magnified.

This is the Talmudic mentality:

Jesus is sometimes shown in modern illustrations  with his head covered like a Pharisee. Where is the Biblical warrant for men to cover their heads? There is none. But it is found in the Babylonian Talmud, Kiddushin 31a: "Rabbi Huna the son of Rabbi Yehoshua 'would not walk four cubits with an uncovered head.”

"Jews don't read the Bible literally. We read it through the lens of generations of interpretations and acknowledge the evolution of human understanding of God. The Talmudic image of God is vastly different from the image of God presented in the Bible.” 

-- Rabbi Laura Geller, Senior Rabbi, Temple Emanuel of Beverly Hills, California

Huffington Post | April 2, 2011
"Kabbalah is the soul of the Torah. The Bible and the Talmud are the laws and the history. Kabbalah is the soul that vivifies history and gives life meaning."
--Rabbi Aaron Raskin, Congregation B'nai Avraham, Brooklyn Heights, N.Y
Ventura County Star | May 9, 2011

Updated 02/07/11: here [Falsification of Talmud tractate Sanhedrin 37a]
Updated 02/27/11:here [Democracy in Judaism]

Updated 04/05/11: here [Judaism's 'Passover': Biblical or Talmudic?]

Updated 9/15/11: here [“Rabbi obstructs fraud probe; citing Talmud"]

Updated 12/30/11: here: ["Judaism treats women like filthy little things"]
Updated 1/05/12: here: [“Is a Jew Obligated to Rescue a Non-Jew?”]

Updated 3/18/12: here: [The Other Side of the Talmud Debate]

Updated 4/14/12: here: [N.Y. Times Says Shiite Religion is Based on Lying]
Updated 7/20/14: here: [Exposé of  Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson]
Updated 12/14/14: here: [The Hanukkah Hoax]

All quotes cited herein are accurate and have been authenticated by Michael Hoffman in the course of more than twelve years of research. They are not “taken out of context.” For the complete context, consult Hoffman’s 1100 page textbook, Judaism Discovered.

We challenge any ordained Orthodox rabbi to refute our documentation in a public, videotaped forum.

Orthodox Judaism is essentially a pagan religion of self-worship in which the idolatry is nearly constant. Orthodox Judaism is the source of much of what is wrong with Churchianity, as opposed to the Gospel of Jesus Christ as practiced by the true Church for more than a thousand years before the modern era. Orthodox Judaism is the enemy of the Bible. Until you understand these truths you will dwell in abject confusion. Orthodox Judaism despises and distorts, nullifies and degrades, the Word of God. All claims that the rabbinic traditions and sacred texts in any way enhance or explain the Bible, are delusions.
The elders of Israel turned aside from the true God and fell to idolatry in Jerusalem (Ezekiel 8:11-18), and then entering into Babylon, they brought their idols with them in their hearts. They would not let go of their idols. They saw many of their brethren in captivity for that sin, they heard Ezekiel prophesy against their practices and those who upheld them in it. They knew that Nebuchadnezzar had no good will toward them, yet idol worship was firmly entrenched in their hearts. When idols get into Bethel, God's house, it is extremely difficult to remove them; but when they get into the hearts of men, they become immovable. To this day, the rabbis hold fast to their barbarous occult superstitions and idolatrous practices, notwithstanding all the judgments of God which have come upon them. The Talmudists are very tenacious of their chief idol, themselves. Millions of "Christians" esteem Judaism and consequently have become co-idolaters with them. They mock God, thereby. But God is not mocked.

The Talmud is Judaism's holiest book (actually a collection of books). Its authority takes precedence over the Old Testament in Judaism. Evidence of this may be found in the Babylonian Talmud (“BT”) itself, Erubin 21b (Soncino edition): "My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah (Old Testament).”

The late Rabbi Joseph D. Soloveitchik (above) was regarded as one of the most influential rabbis of the 20th century, the "unchallenged leader" of Orthodox Judaism and the top international authority on halakha (rabbinic law). Soloveitchik was responsible for instructing and ordaining more than 2,000 rabbis, "an entire generation" of Judaic leadership. N.Y. Times reporter Ari Goldman described the basis of the rabbi's authority:
“Rabbi Soloveitchik came from a long line of distinguished Talmudic scholars...Until his early 20s, he devoted himself almost exclusively to the study of the Talmud...He came to Yeshiva University's Elchanan Theological Seminary where he remained the pre-eminent teacher in the Talmud...He held the title of Leib Merkin professor of Talmud...sitting with his feet crossed in front of a table bearing an open volume of the Talmud.” —New York Times, April 10, 1993, p. 38.
Nowhere does Mr. Goldman refer to Rabbi Soloveitchik's knowledge of the Bible as the basis for being one of the leading authorities on Judaic law. The rabbi's credentials are all predicated upon his mastery of the Talmud. The Mishnah, the initial section of the Talmud, is based on the Oral traditions of the first century Pharisees, which Jesus confronted during His lifetime. Hence, Judaism is the religion of the Pharisees, not of God or His Holy Word.
In another instance, New York Times reporter Joseph Berger in his obituary for the Viznitz Grand Rabbi, Moshe Yehoshua Hager, stated concerning the focus of the rabbi's devotion that he was "reputed to study 70 pages of the Talmud a day and was known for his scholarly discourses on ethics." Nowhere in his obituary does Mr. Berger refer to Rabbi Hager’s study of the Bible as the basis for his scholarly ethics.  Rabbi Hager's credentials are predicated solely on his focus on the Talmud. Cf. "Rabbi Moshe Hager Dies; Hasidic Leader Was 95," New York Times, March 16, 2012, p. B10.
"Although my father is a citizen of the United States, he lives in his own republic: the republic of the Talmud...along with several other relatives...They are decidedly not steeped in Scripture. On the contrary, the noise in my father's mind is informed by the parliamentary debates of the Talmud — the sing-song back and forth about an egg that was laid on a holiday...Growing up, I myself was a citizen of that very same austere republic, albeit a restless one. I went to a black-hat yeshiva where the entire emphasis was on the Talmud.” - Simon Yisrael Feuerman, Tablet magazine, March 12, 2012
Judaism is not dedicated to worshipping the God of the Bible -- the true God of True Israel. Judaism’s god is derived from Talmudic doctrine: it is the Judaic people themselves. The religion of Judaism is fundamentally oriented toward the manifestation of the deadly sin of pride in the form of the racial idolatry of their self-worship:
"...I am a committed Jew. I belong to an Orthodox synagogue, send my children to Jewish school and yearn to instill in them the same devotion to the Jewish people that my parents instilled in me." Prof. Peter Beinart, New York Times, March 19, 2012 p. A21.
Prof. Beinart makes no mention of devotion to God as his first priority. Instead, the first priority he cites as an Orthodox Judaic, instilled in him by his parents, is “devotion to the Jewish people."
Question: Are Gentiles allowed to study the Babylonian Talmud?
Answer: Deeming this inheritance the exclusive property of Judaics, the "sages" prohibited gentiles from learning Talmud and Judaics from teaching it to them. A strident prohibition was also expressed in the Zohar. Rabbi Menahem Hameiri connected this edict to a similar prohibition in the same Talmudic passage which prohibits gentiles from observing Shabbat (the Sabbath). He believed the prohibition stemmed from concerns that “insider knowledge” might allow the gentile to pass himself off as a "Jew" and "undermine ritual behaviors." This issue took a new turn when the rabbis began to consider the propriety of translating the Talmud into the vernacular. A number of rabbis opposed such translations not only because they feared that "anti-Semites" would ridicule the texts, but because in principle they believed this proscription forbade making Talmudic texts accessible to the gentile world.

The Babylonian Talmud: Just a series of debates?

Our enemies and detractors among the rabbis and their allies insult the intelligence of the uninformed by deceitfully claiming that Hoffman’s "Talmud quotes only reflect a series of debates between rabbis," rather than serving as a law-making function within Judaism. 

In the course of attempting to forge a connection between the U.S. Constitution and the Babylonian Talmud which Thomas Jefferson mocked and despised, Benjamin Wittes of the “conservative” Brookings Institute writes the following nonsense:

"The Talmud is a series of debates—and commentaries on those debates—on a text called the Mishnah.”

The concept of a multiplicity of interpretations is not something we deny. Orthodox Judaism is a situation-ethics religion whose disposable “morality" has a shelf life according to the zeitgeist, as for example, Rambam’s injunctions on killing gentiles, heretics and Christians, depends on whether Judaics are in the ascendant in a particular era, or not. 

Judaism’s situation ethics revolve around relatively few fixed, non-negotiable sacred dogmas, such as the superiority of the “Jew,” the inferiority of the gentile, the filthiness of the female menstruant, the evil of Jesus Christ and His Mother, etc.

Rabbinic law, the halacha, is derived first from the Mishnah, then from the Gemara, and then from successor texts having canonical status. How this halacha comes to be formed and exert authority is a matter of exegetical rules pertaining to hermeneutic and epistemological boundaries and determinations which do not derogate any portion of the Talmud Bavli (Babylonian Talmud). Almost all of the Talmud Bavli at one time or another can be valid and authoritative, depending on the circumstances of the time.

In Erubin 13b we observe that the school of Hillel and the school of Shammai differed. These schools are depicted as disputing for three years over whose ruling constitutes the halacha. In this case, even though it was subsequently determined that the halacha was according to Hillel, it is written that both Shammai and Hillel represent the words of the living God. [Cf.  Bar-Ilan University Prof. Avi Sagi, “Both are the Words of the Living God: A Typological Analysis of Halakhic Pluralism,” in Hebrew Union College Annual no. 65 (1995). Also cf. Prof. William “Zev" Kolbrenner, “Chiseled from All Sides: Hermeneutics and Dispute in Rabbinic Judaism,” Association for Jewish Studies Review, no. 28 (2004)].

Since both schools of rabbinic thought represent the word of God according to the authentic teaching of Orthodox Judaism, both represent the Torah sheBeal peh, the Oral “Torah" of the ancient Pharisees embodied by “Chazal," the Phraisaic and Talmudic “sages” who concocted the halacha. 

Viewed within the perspective of the rabbinic hermeneutic — which is so often denied in public — the exchanges between competing rabbinic views within the Talmud Bavli are 1. the basis of rabbinic law (halacha) and 2. have authority and validity even when in certain historical periods another view predominates. 

Therefore, when our opponents claim that the racist, demonic, anti-Christian, misogynist and insane statements from the Talmud should be dismissed as the mere flotsam of banal debates, they are lying, in the flagrant and familiar pattern that has come to be known as chutzpah. 

Judaism is Not the Religion of the Old Testament

Time to face Haredi secret

By Efrat Shapira-Rosenberg

“Not too long ago I happened to speak with a young man who studies at one of the ‘flagships’ of the Haredi yeshiva world; a yeshiva which is no doubt among the most important and elitist ones. We spoke about various issues, and at one point I referred to a certain Biblical character I'm especially fond of. This figure was not one of the Bible's leading actors like Abraham or Moses, but it was not a particularly marginal character either, but rather, an interesting and significant one in my view; one that conveys an important message to biblical scholars. So why am I telling you all this? Because the guy had no idea what I was talking about.
“He never heard about this figure, he was unfamiliar with it, and he was certainly unfamiliar with the important messages it teaches us...the time has come to shatter the myth and explicitly address the most open secret which we all have known for a while now – Haredi education in its various yeshivas only focuses on one thing, while creating ignorant students on every other front.
“An important clarification: I am not referring, like secular critics, to the Haredi disregard for subjects such as math, science, English literature, etc...This is a different problem. The issue I have is with the fact that the vast majority of yeshivas only teach Talmud and related questions and answers. That's it. What about the Bible?
“I am not disparaging, Heaven forbid, the importance of the Talmud. Yet for once let's talk about the religious people who strictly adhere to the mitzvahs, yet are unfamiliar with the Bible...And this is not an anomaly – this is the norm. The only Biblical verses familiar to yeshiva students are those quoted by Talmud sages, and that's that. The Bible is seen as a sort of inferior genre that is appropriate for young children (or for women)...” 
Source: Ynetnews.com | Feb. 10, 2010

Haredi = an Israeli word for Hasidic Judaics, such as Chabad.

Yeshiva = Judaic religious academy.

Since God already gave the Torah to the Jewish people on Mt. Sinai we no longer pay attention to heavenly voices. God must submit to the decisions of a majority vote of the rabbis.”

—BT Bava Metzia 59b

TORAH: This word is Orthodox Judaism's badge of authority. The rabbis proclaim that they have the Torah, have mastered the Torah, base their laws on the Torah and that they are Torah-true. Yet these rabbinic claims are a deceptive play on words, for the "Torah" which they base their laws upon is not the Old Testament, but the formerly Oral Tradition of the Pharisees known as the Torah SheBeal Peh, consisting of the Mishnah and Gemara, which comprise the Talmud, as well as subsequent enactments by esteemed rabbinic legal authorities.
Consequently, when the rabbis are boasting about their relationship with the "Torah," Christians are deceived into imagining that the rabbis are harkening to the Old Testament, known as the Torah SheBichtav. Actually, Orthodox Judaism’s law has no basis in the divine Old Testament. Instead, Judaism’s laws emanate from the man-made Talmud (Torah SheBeal Peh).
The non-Biblical basis of Judaism is acknowledged in the Mishnah itself:
“The laws concerning the Sabbath, Festal-offerings and acts of trespass are as mountains hanging by a hair, for they have scant Scriptural basis but many laws” —Mishnah Hagiga i, 8.
Judaism’s arcane texts secretly admit that the Talmud is not of Moses, rather it is “where Moses is buried.” —Tikkunei Zohar 1:27.
In BT Menachot 29b, the rabbis claim that God transported Moses into the future, to the yeshiva of the second-century Rabbi Akiva. Moses is depicted as sitting at the back of the class, listening  to the day's lesson, which is on the Mosaic law. Yet Moses can't understand the teaching that is being imparted by Rabbi Akiva! Here the Gemara itself is admitting that Talmudic Judaism had so diluted and distorted the Pentateuch with rabbinic traditions that Moses himself no longer recognized the teaching ascribed to him.
When faced with the claim by the rabbis of their supposed “Torah” faith, Christians ought to ask them, "To which 'Torah are you loyal, rabbi? According to Jesus Christ, one cannot be loyal to both the Oral “Torah” of man and the Scriptural Torah of God (Mark 7:9).
Jesus told the Pharisees they were the sons of those who killed the prophets and were witnesses against themselves in this regard (Matthew 23:31).
It is written in the Babylonian Talmud of Pharisaic Judaism that the prophet Isaiah was justifiably killed for stating that the Israelites had unclean lips.
—BT Yebamoth 49b.
About Noah, the Holy Bible teaches: Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his generation. Noah walked with God. (Genesis 6:9).
The Talmud falsely interprets the phrase “in his generation” to mean that in any other generation Noah would not be holy or significant: "Noah was only righteous in his generation; had he lived in the generation of Abraham, he would not have been considered significant at all.” [B.T. Sanhedrin 108a]
In Hebrew “blameless" denotes without flaw. Noah is a precursor of Abraham, not less than Abraham. What is required of Noah, God also requires of Abraham: to walk before Him and be blameless. The Talmud is wrong to denigrate Noah. And it gets worse. The rabbinic Midrash declares that no good was found in Noah (Midrash Rabbah: Genesis I [Soncino 1983, vol. 1], p. 289). This Midrash also teaches that Noah was an alcoholic who was castrated when he was on his way to have coitus. (Midrash Rabbah: Genesis I [Soncino 1983, vol. 1], pp. 290-291; 293). These texts give evidence for the fact that Judaism’s "Noahide Laws” are not a reference to the Biblical Noah, despite public dissimulation to the contrary. Judaism’s misnamed "Noahide Laws" are a Talmudic subterfuge. They are not of Noah or the Old Testament.

A typical example of Talmudic nonsense about Biblical patriarchs concerns King Solomon and the sacred Temple. Who could believe such rubbish about King Solomon and God's Temple except the self-deluding denizens of the synagogue? The Babylonian Talmud teaches that "hobgoblins" (mischievous devils) helped to build the Temple, and that King Solomon was succeeded as King of Israel not by Rehoboam as the Bible says, but by Ashmodeus, the king of the demons, as the Talmud says.
The sages inform us that "everyone helped in the construction of this Temple - even the spirits, the hobgoblins, the angels" (Shir Hashirim Rabba 1:5).
...Thereafter, although he (Solomon) is successful politically and militarily, his inner world begins to crumble till finally he is "replaced" by Ashmodeus, King of the underworld spirits (Talmud, Gittin 68b).
Talmudic circumcision: According to the New York Times of March 8, 2012 (p. A26) two-thirds of newborn boys in New York City’s Orthodox Judaic communities undergo metzitzah b’peh circumcision -- molestation by a "mohel" as he performs fellatio ("metzitzah b’peh," i.e. "oral suction") on their private parts during the bris milah (circumcision) rite.  Under Orthodox Judaism, but not the Bible, one of the first experiences a Judaic male baby undergoes in his life is submitting to fellatio. Judaism is an anti-Biblical religion which defames and degrades the Holy Name of God by the loathsome practices it falsely ascribes to Him. It is the Pharisaic traditions of the man-made Torah SheBeal Peh (Oral Law), as committed to writing in the Mishnah (Shabbath 19:2) and the Gemara (Shabbat 133b) of the Babylonian Talmud and successive halachic texts, which are guilty of being the source of this profoundly pathological and demonic perversion inflicted on helpless Judaic infant boys, and which is perfectly legal throughout the United States, to our nation's shame and disgrace.

How can anyone say they oppose the molestation of children and permit the ritual molestation of Judaic babies as one of the first experiences of their lives? Could anything be more “anti-semitic” than the legalization of metzitzah b’peh? 

What is metzitzah b’peh?

It is the act of sucking the blood from the circumcised penis of the infant child by direct oral contact.

How do Judaic children get ill and die from this type of circumcision?

Since the Judaic infant's penis has just been cut, the wound can be infected with whatever germs are present in the mouth of the mohel (rabbinic circumciser). Nowadays, the main culprit is herpes, as documented by the New York City Health Commissioner. In the 19th century it was syphilis and in the 20th century there were cases of tuberculosis and diphtheria; there have certainly been other fatal illnesses transmitted as well.

Is metzitzah b’peh a commandment in the Bible or the Talmud?

It is only a commandment of the Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 133b.

Rav Papa said: “Any professional [mohel] that does not suck out [the blood] – this is dangerous and he should be removed from his position.” In the Talmud’s analysis, the fact that metzitzah b’peh is a part of the post-circumcision medical intervention is an axiom.

Judaic children have been sickened and maimed and Judaic children have died because of Judaism’s Talmudic circumcision rite.

On June 12, 2006, after massive lobbying in favor of this circumcision-fellatio, including by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the New York State Department of Health, led by Roman Catholic Commissioner Antonia Novello, reaffirmed the legality of the molestation. For further information, cf. Judaism Discovered, pp. 678-683.

Documented Teachings of the Talmud and the Rabbis of Orthodox Judaism

(BT = Babylonian Talmud)

Babylonian Talmud: BT Sanhedrin 57a

It is a Blessed Deed to Kill “anti-Semites”: "Amalek was the first anti-Semite...Today, the seed of Amalek has been lost; however, if (it) becomes clear that a certain person is an Amalekite, following in their ways, it would be a mitzvah (blessed deed) to kill him (see, Kol Mevaser 2:42).
"...if an Amalekite decides to take upon himself the fulfillment of the Seven Mitzvoth of Noah's Sons, according to Jewish law, there is no longer an obligation to kill him...
Source: Rabbi Eliezer Melamed, "Amalek: War Against the Root of Evil," Israel National News, Feb. 28, 2012.
Rabbi Melamed is the head of the Har Bracha Hesda Yeshiva, a branch of the settler movement in the occupied West Bank of Palestine. The settlers receive financial and other types of support from "Christian-Zionists" in America. Christians are idolaters:

Rabbi Melamed has written: "...they (Christians) still embrace idolatry, believing that 'oto ha'ish' [Jesus] is god and the messiah, who will be resurrected to redeem the world...As we learned from the words of the Rambam (Moses Maimonides, Laws of Kings 11:4): "Jesus the Christian, who thought he was the Messiah… was the subject of a prophesy in the Book of Daniel (11:14): "…also the renegades of your people will exalt themselves to fulfill the vision – but they will stumble." Could there be a greater stumbling block than this [Jesus]? For all the prophets spoke of the Messiah who will redeem and save Israel, who will ingather all its exiles, and who will strengthen them in the fulfillment of the Torah's commandments – while he [Jesus] caused Israel to be killed by the sword, their remnants to be dispersed and humiliated, the Torah to be switched for something else, and most of the world to worship a god other than the God of Israel!""

From the Talmud, BT Shabbat 15c (also cf. Baba Metzia 33A), comes the three levels of study, ranked from lowest to highest:
A. "He who occupies himself with Scripture gains merit that is no merit.
B. "He who occupies himself with Mishnah gains merit for which people receive a reward.
C. "He who occupies himself with Talmud—there is no source of merit greater than this.”
King Solomon's successor as king of Israel was the king of demons: "King Solomon was replaced by Ashmodeus, King of the demons.” —BT Gittin 68b. (The Bible says that King Solomon was replaced by his son, Rehoboam [1 Kings 11:43], not a mythological king of demons).

No Biblical Basis for a Bar Mitzvah: The bar mitzvah for boys ("bat" mitzvah for girls) is never mentioned anywhere in the Word of God, and neither Abraham, Isaac or Jacob ceremonialized or celebrated becoming bar mitzvah. The supreme law of Judaism is sourced in the Babylonian Talmud and it is in the Talmud where the age of maturation for boys and girls is stated. According to Rabbi Mendy Rubenfeld, director of Chabad-Lubavitch of Poway, California's so-called Hebrew School, "The Talmud dedicates pages to it, and it's specifically talking about bar mitzvah. It talks about when a man matures, when a woman matures. And it comes to the conclusion that [the ages are] 13 for a boy and 12 for a girl….And it is discussed in detail."
A Judaic male is obligated to say the following prayer every day:
“Thank you G-d for not making me a gentile, a woman or a slave.”
—BT Menahoth 43b-44a.
Mary, the Mother of Jesus, was a prostitute.
—BT Sanhedrin 106b. BT Sanhedrin 67a. Shabbath 104b.
All gentile women without exception are: “Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyahand Zonah” (menstrual filth, slaves, heathens and prostitutes).
—BT Sanhedrin 81b - 82a.
BT Kiddushin 66c: “The best of the gentiles: kill him; the best of snakes: smash its skull; the best of women: is filled with witchcraft.” The uncensored version of this text appears in Tractate Soferim (New York, M. Higer, 1937), 15:7, p. 282.
“The more possessions the more worry; the more wives, the more witchcraft.”
—Hillel, first century, Mishnah Abot 2:7.

Judaic men are not to hear  a woman singing, not even Judaic women: “The voice of a woman is nakedness; a handbreadth of a woman is nakedness” (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Berachot 24a). The duty of “modesty" also applies to a handbreadth of a woman’s body that is normally covered, and also hearing a woman sing (Rosh, S’mag, R’id, S’mak, R’ah, R’yaz). According to the overwhelming majority of ‘Rishonim,’ for reasons of modesty, it is forbidden to hear a woman sing. The Shulchan Aruch declares that it is forbidden to hear a woman sing and this is how all of the later poskim (judges of the law) ruled (cf. Shulchan Aruch, Orech Chaim 21:1; Mishna Berurah 75:17).

"Sex with one’s wife is comparable to to the suffering of circumcision."

--Rabbi Nachman of Breslov, great-grandson of the Baal Shem Tov, the founder of Hasidism. [Quoted by Gideon Lewis-Kraus, in "One Schlep Forward,"  March 13, 2012].

The New Testament books of the Christians are to be burned whenever possible.
—BT Shabbath 116a.
Gentiles are not to be trusted: "...a gentile’s word is totally discounted regarding ritual prohibitions...In a situation where a gentile’s word is not relied upon, his conversion to Judaism will not influence our acceptance of his testimony.”
—Rabbi Ezra Basri, Chief Justice, District Court, Jerusalem, “The Testimony of a Gentile Regarding Ritual Matters,” in Ethics of Business Finance & Charity (Jerusalem: Haktav Press), vol. 2, chapter 13.
No need to be fair to gentiles: "The laws (of fairness) mentioned above only apply between two Jewish neighbors. Gentiles do not necessarily respect these principles and, hence, there is no obligation to show them such consideration in return.” Rabbi Ezra Basri, ibid., vol. 4, chapter 2.
“On Passover Eve they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went out before him for 40 days and proclaimed, Jesus of Nazareth is going to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited and led Israel astray. Whoever knows of an argument that may be proposed in his favor should come and present that argument on his behalf. But the judges did not find an argument in his favor, so they hanged him on Passover Eve...Did Jesus of Nazareth deserve that a search be made for an argument in his favor? Surely he incited others to idol worship.” — BT Sanhedrin 43a; Steinsaltz v. 17, 158-159.
Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be boiled in hot excrement in hell.
—BT Erubin 21b.
“...Jesus shares his place in the Netherworld (hell) with Titus and Balaam, the notorious arch enemies of the Jewish people. Whereas Titus is punished for the destruction of the Temple by being burned to ashes, reassembled, and burned over and over again, and whereas Balaam is castigated by sitting in hot semen, Jesus’ fate consists of sitting forever in boiling excrement.”
—Peter Schäfer, Jesus in the Talmud (Princeton University Press), p. 13. BT Gittin 57a.
The rabbinic legal authorities of Orthodox Judaism decree that the worship of Jesus Christ constitutes idol worship (“avodah zarah”).
—Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Avodat Kochavim 9:4. Teshuvos Pri ha-Sadeh 2:4. Igros Moshe, Y.D. 3:129-6.
Idol worshippers are liable to the death penalty under the Talmudic “Noachide Laws.”
—BT Sanhedrin 57a.
All of the inhabitants of the world are compelled to accept the Noachide laws. If any non-Jew does not accept these laws he should be killed.
—Rabbi Moses Maimonides (The “Rambam”), Mishneh Torah: Hilchot Melachim U'Milchamoteihem ("Laws of Kings and Wars"), Section 8, Halacha 10. 
Michael Hoffman’s commentary: This passage from Hilchot Melachim deals with battle captives, but in the course of elucidating those laws pertaining to captives, Maimonides is drawing on the larger corpus of laws having to do with non-Jews; i.e. the Seven Laws (of the Noachide). [Maimonides is specifically cited in this regard in Tosefot Yom Tov, Avot 3:14]. The call to execute all those "among the nations" (goyim) who do not accept the Noachide laws (not just those who are prisoners of war), is indubitably present in Hilchot Melachim 8:10. In the year 2014 this killing may occur in Palestine, where the Israelis are supreme. In Europe and America Judaic executions of those who worship Jesus Christ as God, or refuse to submit to the Noachide laws, cannot take place at this time. This is due to the fact that Maimonides decreed that killings of obstreperous non-Jews can only occur in those places where “the hand of Israel is powerful over them.” In other words, where Judaic supremacy is complete. Cf. Hilchot Melachim 8:9.

Rabbinic authorities decree that a building set aside for actual (rather than feigned) worship of Jesus Christ is a house of avodah zarah.  —Yayin Malchus, 234-237. Minchas Elazar 1:53-3. Yechaveh Da'as 4:45. Darchei Teshuvah 150:2. Tzitz Eliezer 14:91.
Therefore, when passing a church they utter a curse upon it as follows: “Beis gee'im visach Hashem.” —Birkath ha-Minim, 12th Amidah. BT Berakhot 58b.
Only Jews are human. Non-Jews are not human.
—BT Bava Metzia 114b. BT Kerithoth 6b and 58a.
Regarding a Jew stealing from a non-Jew, the act is permitted.
— BT Sanhedrin 57a.
Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a gentile.
—BT Baba Kamma 113a.
If a Jew is tempted to do evil, he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.
—BT Moed Kattan 17a.
Children, life and sustenance do not depend upon merit but upon mazal(one’s lucky stars).
—BT Mo’ed Kattan 28a.
The Hanukkah Hoax
Diabolical delusion: Pity the so-called “Christians” who teach the so-called “Jews" that it is permissible for them to continue in their sins and remain in Judaism rather than convert to Jesus, since they are "the descendants of David.” But what if they are not? In that case, these pseudo-Jews (Rev. 2:9; 3:9) have been sold a diabolical delusion which destines them to damnation. According to the late David Einsiedler, who wrote in the scholarly journal, Avotaynu: The International Review of Jewish Genealogy, "Careful examination of all available sources leads to the inescapable conclusion that there is no complete, reliable and positive proof of claims of descent from King David, whether via Rashi, Judah Loew the Elder, or any of the other families claimed. There are at present no known sources that could fill the gaps or set the record straight. It is possible that there may be actual descendants somewhere, but at present, no one can produce sufficient and unquestionable proof of this claim."

The preceding documentation was researched by Michael Hoffman. Much more information can be found in his his books Judaism Discovered  and Judaism’s Strange Gods.

If you are any type of racist then you are already Talmudic, whether you know it or not. The Babylonian Talmud is the fount of racism. German Nazi self-worship ultimately derived, by a western occult pathway (Giordano Bruno, Johannes Reuchlin, et al.), from Kabbalistic and Talmudic doctrine.
________________________

"Salvation is of the Jews” (John 4:22). Judaic people are victims of the Talmud. Judaism is destructive of the souls of Judaic people. Our work is aimed at exposing the Talmudic ideology, and rescuing those trapped by it. Jesus taught us to love our enemies and do good to those who persecute us. The intent of our information is to convert Talmudists through the truth and love of Jesus Christ.

_____________________

The information herein is published by Warrant of John 18:37; Galatians 4:16.

_____________________

New York Times, October 7, 2011, p. A10

Judaism Discovered. Massive textbook by Michael Hoffman.Softcover book. 1102 pages.
Kindle digital edition available for download.

Judaism’s Strange Gods (paperback condensation of Judaism Discovered with some new information added) is available in paperback

The Talmid chacham (Talmud teacher) by Issachar Ber Ryback, 1922

________________________________________

"My writing and research are in defiance of the rabbinic conceit that they possess a truth that permits no morally conceivable objection.” Michael Hoffman