Obama Pushes Putin One Step Closer to War
Obama Pushes Putin One Step Closer to War
Friday, December 30, 2016 8:21
The Russian Embassy In Washington DC
Obama has expelled 35 senior diplomats from the United States. Is the US cutting off diplomatic relations? Is war at hand?
THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT OBAMA IS TRYING TO START WORLD WAR III THE PAST WEEK WHERE WE HAVE SEEN THE CIA MURDER OF A RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR TO TURKEY AND THE CIA TAKEDOWN OF A RUSSIAN MILITARY PLANE AND NOW EXPELLING 35 RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS.
What Does It Mean?
Often times, when the diplomats are expelled by a host country, diplomatic relations are nearing an end and war may not be far off. I know that when it was announced, yesterday, many of us in the Independent Media had some fear and trepidation that war could be close. However, with perspective of time to judgethis event, it is clear that we are looking at the selling of a lie to the American people.
Personally, I breathed a sigh of relief when I came to understand that Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Sergei Kislyak, will not be one of those Russian diplomats expelled by Obama.
President Obama’s Action Is Part of a Major Obama Coverup
The expelling of the senior Russian diplomats comes on the heels of the CIA and FBI conclusion that Russia was responsible for hacking the DNC and releasing controversial emails, which highlited criminal behavior, on the part of Clinton and related associates. The purpose of the hack, according to the Obama administration, was done with the intention of helping Donald Trump to win the 2016 Presidential election.
The CIA Has Directly Interfered In At Least 81 Elections
The U.S. has a very long and shameful history of attempting to influence and bully various presidential elections in foreign countries. According to Dov Levin of Carnegie Mellon University, the USA has interfered in foreign election 81 times between the years of 1946 and 2000. Levin has maintained a database on the topic.
Levin is quick to point out that the 81 incidences does not include military coups, forced regime change, both violent and nonviolent. The number is also not included in U.S. efforts following the election of candidates the U.S. didn’t like, to force the elected and undesirable candidates from power. Some examples of this type of interference would include Iran, Guatemala and Chile. Nor does this 81 number include general assistance with the electoral process, such as election monitoring and getting out the vote efforts. Finally, the number does not include efforts at promoting propaganda designed to influence an election which is what the United States is formally accusing Russia of doing.
It is interesting to note that the information obtained from Dr. Levin’s analyses came from the mainstream media’s LA Times which is a well-known propagandist for the establishment. If the MSM is printing this information which casts serious doubt on the authenticity of Obama’s actions towards Russia, then how can any American take Obama seriously when it comes to allegations of Russian hacking?
As dig deeper into the so-called reasons for Obama’s provocative actions, the facts, the substance and the logic of the President’s actions quickly breakdown with regard to the integrity of yesterday’s actions.
Aiding and Abetting Criminal Behavior
Even if the Obama administration’s allegation was 100% correct, so what? The Russians are not accused of uncovering state secrets. They have gained no demonstratable advantage except that is established they would rather deal with Trump because Clinton only offered uncompromising positions (e.g. no fly zone would be established in Syria) which would have resulted in World War III.
Additionally, there are no allegations of espionage. The only thing that the Russians are accused of doing is that they hacked into the DNC and further exposed the criminal behavior of Hillary Clinton. Again, I ask, so what?
IF A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT IS ENGAGED, OR HAS BEEN ENGAGED IN CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR WHICH COULD INFLUENCE THEIR ACTIONS AS PRESIDENT, SHOULDN’T WE WANT TO KNOW THIS INFORMATION REGARDLESS OF WHERE IT CAME FROM?
President Obama should be sending the Russians a thank you note for caring enough about American justice that the Russians felt it was there duty to warn the American people that they were about to be taken over by one of the most sociopathic criminals of all time, Hillary Clinton. But no, Obama seeks to cover up the criminal behaviors of Hillary Clinton because the NWO needed her to start World War III and Trump is not on board with that idea. Now it is up to Obama to get that job done by January 20th and he is certainly doing his best.
The Evidence Against the Russians Is Not Forthcoming
The Obama administration is the most corrupt and criminal administration in the history of the United States. Obama has run this country more like a third-world banana republic than a republic with a Constitution. From the Fast and Furious scandal, to the Benghazi scandal, and all of the scandals in between, the rule of law in this country was put to rest under this administration.
The Obama administration has never revealed exactly what the Russians discovered. From what I have seen from Wikileaks, about the only thing that the Russians uncovered was yesterday’s news.
WHERE ‘S YOUR PROOF, OBAMA?DIDN’T WIKILEAKS REVEAL MORE ABOUT CLINTON’S CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR THAN THE RUSSIANS?DIDN’T THE INDEPENDENT MEDIA REVEAL MORE CLINTON CRIMES THAN THE RUSSIANS?
To the American people, is now clear why the Independent Media has now been demonized and falsely accused of being Russian agents?
As serious as this event is and the ramifications of this could lead to extreme censorship in America, when one connects this dot to other dots, it is more than concerning, it is terrifying. What am I talking about, I will publishing the answer to that question this afternoon.
I am not a fan of Putin, but I am grateful that his people have chosen to mock Obama rather than to give into his clear intent to provoke World War III.
Comments
Post a Comment