So who are these Khazarian Gangsters aka Synagogue of Satan, Satanist Criminals and where did they really come from
History of the Amalekite Khazars
(As excerpted from the Welcome section at www.age-end.com)
In addressing the Scriptural prophecies addressing the age-end House of Israel (believed by some to be the United States and White British Commonwealth), we must first define who are the enemies involved in the prophecy. In the fall of the House of Israel to the Assyrians in the 7th and 8th centuries BCE, the Assyrians were the clear enemies. In the fall of the House of Judah to the Babylonians in c554 BCE, the Babylonians were the clear enemies. In those cases from history, the judgments evidently came on the people literally as stated.
But complications existed in defining the enemies in the fall of the House of Judah to the Romans in the 1st century CE because the Jews had an internal enemy which was far more dangerous than the Romans. It was the Amalekite Herods and Herodians who had taken over Judah (Joel 3:19). Hence, the enemy, who had become the head while the true Jews had become the tail, was not the Romans. It was the Herods and Herodians, whom the Jews had forcibly/supposedly converted to Judaism in the first and second centuries BCE (note, the Herodians were said to be the Amalekite followers/racial cousins of Herod).
Without attempting a complete explanation on why the Amalekite Herods and Herodians were such staunch enemies of Judah in the first century CE (this reality explains why Herod's descendants and Herodian colleagues were the primary enemies of the New Testament YESHUA, Whom they murdered in 30 CE), a few facts on the backdrop will be shared here (the full explanation on this issue is given in v. 10, 11, 12, 25 and 29 of Ezekiel and YHWH's Judgment for the Good News People at age-end.com). In short, Esau (father of the Edomites) struggled with his twin brother Yakov during the pregnancy of their mother (Gen 25:21-23). In time, Esau sold his birthright to Yakov for a bowl of soup (Gen 25:33). Later, Yakov took his blessings as well (Gen 27:19-30).
This backdrop brought on a perpetual hatred by Esau for his brother and the desire and plan by Esau to kill Yakov (Gen 27:41). Esau moved down to the Mount Seir area and miscegenated with the fallen Canaanite line of Satan-Cain-Ham and became a fornicator (Heb 12:16). Yakov meanwhile went to Mesopotamia and took wives from among his own people. These marriages in time defined the lineage and genetic differences of Esau versus those of Yakov.
Genesis 36 outlines the fallen line of Esau-Edom. His oldest son was Eliphaz (Gen 36:4). Amalek was the oldest son of Eliphaz (Gen 36:12), meaning that Esau's hereditary birthright and possession of the Mount Seir area passed to Eliphaz and finally to Amalek. By the time of the Exodus, only Amalek remained in the Mount Seir area as the other descendants of Esau had moved on (i.e., the Phoenicians to the coasts of Canaan and others to eventual Turkestan). With the passage of Mount Seir to Amalek, the perpetual hatred and desire to kill Yakov and his descendants passed as well to Amalek (Ezek 35:5; Jasher 58:28). This brought about Amalek's attack on Israel during the Exodus (Ex 17:8-16; Deut 25:17-19).
To understand Amalek's attack and attempt to destroy Israel during the Exodus, it would be well to review the passage of Esau's hatred to Eliphaz and Amalek in Jasher 29 and the writings of Menachem K. Kasher in the Encyclopedia of Biblical Interpretation. Jasher 29:31-41 notes that Esau commissioned his oldest son Eliphaz to kill Yakov. So Eliphaz took ten of his mother's brothers with him and lurked after Yakov near Shechem. But YHWH caused Eliphaz to be afraid and back off. Thereupon, Eliphaz stole Yakov's property and took it to his father in Mount Seir. Esau was furious because Eliphaz had failed to kill Yakov. So, per an ancient Jewish Midrash, Kasher (v. viii, p.247) gives it that Esau later gave the same charge to his grandson Amalek.
Following Amalek's attempt to kill Israel during the Exodus, YHWH ordered Israel to kill all of the Amalekite men, women and children (Ex 17:14; Num 24:20; Deut 25:17-19; I Sam 15:2-3) --because they were so genetically evil and because YHWH was against them (Ex 17:14; Mal 1:1-5; Rom 9:13). Naturally, Israel, with so-called Christian love, refused to exterminate them; so they survived for the next 3,000 years plus to now bring havoc on Israel in the age-end (Ezek 36:1-7 and Psalms 83:2, 7). From the time of Esau's charge to Amalek, to destroy Yakov Israel, Amalek has been working full time to fulfill that commission. He is now trying to do it in the age-end.
So you ignorant, foolish, goy descendants of Yakov--wanting to extend Christian love and charity to the Amalekites--need to wake up from your deep sleep and understand that the Amalekites are planning and scheming right now, today, on how they are going to destroy you Israelites. The Amalekites are not interested in mercy or any of that Christian pap about love. They unconsciously hate you Israelites with a deep passion and commitment. They are determined to destroy you forever (by illicit sex and war), because it has been in their genes for almost 3,800 years.
The Amalekites Thus Became the Classic Enemies of Israel.
In the vein of the coming judgment on the House of Israel, the real enemies will not be the supposed external enemies. Instead, it will be people internally within the House of Israel. It will be the same internal enemies who became the head of Judah to damage, hurt and destroy Judah over the centuries. In the age-end, they have become the head of Israel to hurt, damage and destroy Israel. Thus, the problem is not with the external enemies.
So while the fall of Israel to the Assyrians and Babylonians is important historically, in defining the age-end, the real ante-type to the House of Israel will be the fall of the House of Judah to the Romans in 70 CE where Judah's real enemies were not the Romans, but the internal Herods/Herodians who were pretending to be fellow Jews when in fact they were the classic enemies of Judah--the Amalekites (see Rev 2:9 and 3:9 on these people pretending to be Jews when they were not Jews at all).
In the age-end House of Israel, these same classic enemies of Israel are still the Amalekites. But this time, they come to Israel as Khazar Jews who supposedly converted to Judaism in about 740 CE in the land area of historic Ashkenaz-Khazaria in central Asia/modern Georgia. Since they come from the historic land area inhabited by Ashkenaz, after Noah's flood, they have come to call themselves Ashkenazi Jews (Khazar bankers, like the Rothschilds, created the Nazi movement in the 1920s under the Khazar Jew Adolf Jacob Schicklgruber [alias Hitler]--thus, the word Nazi is thought to come from Ashke-NAZI). But the Jewish Encyclopedia's article (1905 edition) on the Khazars defines the Khazars as historically coming from Mount Seir (the ancestral home of the Amalekites--Num 24:18-21). Therefore, they are Amalekites--small in stature; generally dark complexioned/swarthy; and with hooked, Hittite noses.
For persons wondering what the historic Amalekite Khazars looked like, the student of truth is invited to search the Internet for pictures of Abraham Foxman, Director of the Anti-Defamation League. Abe seems to epitomize these people, both in looks and in thinking. Hollywood has had some Amalekite actors who too seemed to match the physical appearance of the Amalekites--like Eddie Cantor and Emmanuel Goldenberg (alias Edward G. Robinson). Marble busts of the infamous and evil Amalekite King Herod, the Great, in the first century BCE, had the same physical appearance. When you look at the coloring and the bone structure of the heads of Herod, Foxman, Cantor and Goldenberg, it is easy to see that they were all related.
With the first century CE Jewish-Roman war, many of the Amalekite Idumeans (who had not converted to Judaism), in the lower, Southern part of Idumea (as well as some of their Herodian cousins who were faking conversion in Judea), fled Palestine and migrated north to the land area of Ashkenaz (as documented by William Norman Saxon in the Mask of Edom [p. 5] where the movement of the Amalek Edomites in the first century CE is traced from Palestine north through the Transcaucasia area to the Lower Volga region of Ashkenaz where they became known as Khazars/Yiddish for the Yiddish language they spoke in central Asia (like others leaving the Middle East, the Amalekites lost their historic language and adopted the Yiddish language which seems to be Slavic for the area in Asia where the Slav children of Japheth resided after the flood). Various encyclopedias confirm this movement and settlement in central Asia--like the Concise Columbia Encyclopedia, page 450).
The tie of the Khazars back to Palestine in Second Temple days is proven in a fascinating report from the US government, made sometime after WWI. It surfaces in an interesting fashion from a citation from an “Official Report of the U.S.A. Army Intelligence,” on “Bolshevism and Judaism,” as transmitted by the U.S.A. Army Staff, 2nd Bureau and as compiled by the Official American Services, per a transmission to the US by the US Ambassador to the French Republic (quoted in “The Two Seeds of Genesis 3:15,” 1994 ed, p. 413). This US Army report refers Jews, but those mentioned are political Zionists, “the great majority of whom are not Jews by blood, but only by religion, they being descendants of the Herodians, who were Idumeans of Turko-Mongol blood, and are actually Edomites.” The Herodians were Second Temple Amalek-Edomites, living in Judea.
Since these Ashkenazi Khazars are known to change their names and religions (to better fool and deceive the goyim), they come with Russian, German and English names and as Jews or even as Christians in many instances. But, per the Word (Rev 2:9; 3:9), they are of the Synagogue of Satan (also called sons of Satan, sons of the Devil, serpents, vipers or snakes in the New Testament). In Albert Pike's work on Morals and Dogma, he defines them as being worshippers of Lucifer--thus Luciferians (as will be proven in comments to follow). Too, many of them publicly pretend to be atheists--like the Khazar master Timothy Geithner, the US Secretary of the Treasury.
As noted above, these classic enemies of Israel first took over Judah and the Jews in the first century BCE with the Herods and Herodians and later in about 740 CE with the Amalekite Khazars in central Asia. Now, since about 1913 CE, they have gained total control of the House of Israel nations as well as Judah (as prophesied that Esau would in time break the yoke of Yakov and gain dominion over him--Gen 27:40). While these classic enemies of Israel are adequately identified as Amalekites (in Gen 27:30-45; 36:12; Ex 17:8-16; Num 24:20; Deut 25:17-19; I Sam 15:2-33; 28:15-18; Ps 83:2-17; Isa 21:11-17; Ezek 35:1-15; Hos 7:9; Joel 3:19; Amos 1:11-12; 3:11-15; Oba 1-21; Heb 2:5-20; Mal 1:1-5), Ezek 36:1-7 and Psalms 83:2, 7 precisely define them as Israel's enemies in the age-end.
Deuteronomy 28:43-44 makes it clear that they dwell among Israel as strangers who become the creditors of Israel. They lend money to Israelites; but the Israelites do not lend to them (evidently because they are the bankers owning/controlling the Israelite money through their privately owned/controlled central banks in the Israelite lands). Clearly, they are the persons who promote the taking of interest in the House of Israel nations (Ezek 18:8, 13). They rise higher and higher to become the heads of Israel while the people of Israel become the tail. Ezek 35:10 even quotes their bragging/boasting that both Judah and Israel belong to them as well as the land of Israel (Ezek 11:15; 36:5).
The Scriptures are very clear that these Amalekites make their money and living from the sword/the wars they cause (Gen 27:39-40--see also Understanding Money and War II and XIV at the left menu herein). Tragically, for Israel, YHWH says that they will cause the final catastrophic war that sees the national destruction of the House of Israel in the age-end (Ezek 35:5). This will be WWIII, as brought about by the Khazar plutocratic bankers--as led by the evil Amalekite Khazar House of Rothschild. As blessings have come upon the House of Israel in the age-end of the last 200 years, the Amalekite leaders, in the form of the Khazar bankers (like the Rothschilds, Roggenfelders, Oppenheimers, Lazards, Warburgs, etc), have stolen those blessings and are now planning the final destruction of the House of Israel in WWIII.
There is no doubt whatsoever of the presence of Amalekite Khazar control over the Houses of Judah and Israel here in the age-end. They established this control and maintain it primarily through their ownership and management of media powers as they described some 250 years ago in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (see Understanding Money and War XIV at the left menu herein). With the development of motion pictures and the TV industries (Hollywood) in the 20th century, the media has come to represent substantially more powerful motivational and influencing tools than just the printed page. In any case, today’s modern people of Judah (the true, Oriental Jews) and Israel are completely brainwashed and controlled by the dark powers of the media as exercised by the diabolical ruling Khazars.
As so often happens, these serpent agents of Satan typically use very clever, subtle and cunning methods of deceiving and brainwashing the especially gullible goy peoples of the House of Israel. A perfect illustration of this manipulation and deception was put forth in Professor Kevin MacDonald’s book 'The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in 20th Century Intellectual and Political Movements' which had a review by a TV writer named E. Baumgartner who wrote:
"As a former leftist Hollywood Jew (I wrote TV shows), I can say from personal experience that Prof. MacDonald is 100% correct in this book. The shows I worked on: Mary Tyler Moore Show, That Girl, & Love American Style, among others, were nothing more than Jewish tools (for the most part) to undermine the innocence of American WASP culture, ('Cultural Marxism' as Prof. MacDonald calls it).
"I became disturbed with the studio editorial ‘rule’ that children should be portrayed as sassy and disrespectful towards their parents. A few times I presented a script to my editor (also a Jewish guy) in which I had the child character behaving politely and respectfully towards his parents. The editor changed the lines to make the child bratty/sassy and then told me ‘... that's the way it should be done from now on, unless I tell you otherwise’. That's when I started to see that something else was going on besides just making TV shows. I could see the changes in American society resulting from all this TV propaganda. I eventually left writing and became a teacher. Kudos to Prof. MacDonald for his meticulous research in writing this book."
WASP of course refers to the historic culture of the House of Israel known as WASP--White, Anglo-Saxon, and Protestant. And why would Khazar Jew snakes want to teach the gullible American TV watchers that children should be sassy and disrespectful toward parents and other adults and that this is normal behavior? Man, don’t you get it that such TV propaganda is subtly changing the entire concept of what is right and what is wrong (and especially in terms of interracial sex and homosexuality). This Hollywood and TV propaganda ends up damaging/destroying the family unit, which has been a Satanic goal for the last 6,000 years.
The question of rebellious and hateful children will be further discussed below in this center column on the Leadership Roles of Men, Women and Children in the Age-End (this section is omitted here in this presentation—ed). Suffice to say, the House of Israel is moving in the wrong direction because of Khazar Jew TV writers and producers who want to fulfill the commission started by Satan to Cain (on Adam) some 6,000 years ago, and later given by Esau to Amalek (on Israel) some 3,800 years ago. Khazar Jew media powers, particularly in the movies and on TV, are completely changing/brainwashing an entire population on right and wrong (as will also be described below in the discussion on Amalekite Khazars Lead Sex Sins with Sabbatianism).
Some More Amalekite Khazar History.
Ancient Judaism held that the Amalekites are the most evil people of all time. Historic Jews also held that because they were so evil, none of them could be converted to the truth of the Scriptures (yet, the Jews allowed and even promoted their conversion to Judaism; just as the ignorant Christians are doing today by supposedly converting some few of them to Christianity--like the Roggenfelders and Rosenfeldts who changed their names to Rockefeller and Roosevelt). To fully appreciate Jewish feelings on the Khazars/Yiddish, as they supposedly converted to Judaism, it is necessary to review some more history.
Historically, the Khazars were known to have been nomads and wanderers (Gen 4:11-12). In terms of the Amalek-Edomite Khazars, as discussed so far, “Encyclopaedia Judaica” (v. 10, p. 944) notes that the name Khazar was explained as being derived from the Turkish “quzmak” meaning “to wander” or “to nomadize” or from “quz” meaning “side of mountain exposed to the north” (could this link to Mount Seir?). This reference to wandering and nomadizing connects to the Scriptural account for the descendants of Cain as will be shown below.
Jewish writer Arthur Koestler noted that Soviet archaeologists found that the early houses of these Khazars in central Asia were built in a circular shape and the foundations were sunk into the ground (“The Thirteenth Tribe,” p. 18). Koestler (p. 18) made the case that these dwellings symbolized the transition from portable, dome-shaped tents to permanent dwellings and from the nomadic state to a settled or semi-settled existence. Koestler also suggested that in their early history in the Caucasus they were under tutelage of the old Hun Empire and later under Turkish power (ibid, p. 24).
Gen 4:12 has it that the ground would not yield her strength (produce and food) for Cain and his line and that they would be fugitives and vagabonds in the earth. In Scriptures for America (v. 3, 2003, p. 3), Pete Peters has it that Cain would live off of the fruit of other people's labors, like a parasite. The Soncino Pentateuch (v. I, p. 106) says Cain would not have a place on earth to call his own as a home. He and his descendants would be landless strangers and as nomads living as parasites off the work of other people.
The meaning of the word Canaanite (like the Khazar descendants of Satan-Cain-Ham --see the Two Seed-Lines study at age-end.com) is "merchant, trafficker" (per Strong's Hebrew Dictionary, #3669). The Phoenician (Edomite relatives of the Amalekites) neighbors of the Canaanites were called traffickers by the Prophet Isaiah (Isa 23:8). These traffickers are to be contrasted with people who make their living from the land/soil--like farmers and cattle and sheep ranchers. Today, the Cain people are usually found to be bankers, merchants, entertainers, politicians, doctors, lawyers, etc.
While these Khazars have willingly converted to any and all religions (including Judaism, Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc) in order to be able to steal and plunder from deceived and unsuspecting persons, the truth is that they all seem to be either atheists or Satanists/Luciferians (worshippers of Lucifer, as cited above and as will be further established in comments to follow).
Historians, like Roman Catholic priest John D. O’Connor of Pennsylvania, who have studied the Khazars extensively, indicate that one motivational reason on why the Khazar king in 740 CE tried to convert his people to Judaism was the recognition that they were extremely evil, immoral and depraved. He thought that with conversion to a believed moral religion, like Judaism, that the evil and depravity naturally present in them could be destroyed from their thinking and mentality (as O'Connor outlines in his video on the Synagogue of Satan). The Khazar king (called the Kagan) actually believed that they could be changed and improved with conversion (many Christians believe the same thing). But the Khazar Kagan was wrong because the problem was genetic.
On making the Khazar conversion to Judaism in c740CE, Jewish leaders in Babylon sent religious teachers to the Khazars to try to install some sense of morality, honesty and integrity into the pagan Khazars. “Encyclopaedia Judaica” (v. 10, p. 948) indicates that soon the central Jewish authorities (in Iraq) lost interest in the Khazars, partly because of their imperfect adherence to Judaism which is illustrated in their retention of a number of pagan (shamanist) customs, dating back to their Turkic past.
The “Dictionary of Judaism in the Biblical Period” (p. 367) adds that even after their supposed conversion to Judaism, or even Islam as many converted to Islam over the years, they continued to practice their pre-Jewish and pre-Islamic customs of evil. In other words, conversion meant nothing to them. Thus, their so-called conversion was nothing but show and pretense. They never changed their evil and depraved ways. They were as bad after conversion to Judaism as they were before conversion.
This same phenomenon exists when they have converted to Islam and Christianity over the years (and the same reality also seems to result with some of them when they allegedly convert to the now developing Messianic Jewish motion). They have always continued their same evil ways with the same atheism/Satanism/Luciferianism. This is why most of us lose our shirts whenever we try to have any financial dealings with these Khazars. They are extremely evil people—but smart and tough.
More on the Evil of the Modern Khazars
The writer of this article is very pro the Jewish religion and true Jews (like the Oriental Jews and some of the other good Sephardic Jews). But somehow and someway, I was in time awakened to the gross evil of the Khazar Jews and how they have brought enormous hurt, damage and destruction to the Adamic peoples over the centuries. While I fully appreciate and applaud the huge accomplishments and contributions to truth and righteousness of true Jews, the Khazar Jew pretenders have been a colossal calamity for the Adam kind and particularly for Israel for vast, long centuries.
But this writer is not the only person who finally woke-up to the problem the world faces here in the age-end. We have a very evil group of people who hate us passionately and are out to destroy us—pure and simple. As noted above, The CREATOR was against them because of their genetic evil (Ex 17:14; Mal 1:1-5; Rom 9:13). After their attack on Israel during the Exodus, He ordered Israel to kill all of the Amalekite men, women and children because of their genetic evil (Ex 17:14; Num 24:20; Deut 25:17-19; I Sam 15:2-3). Naturally, Israel disobeyed and today both the Houses of Judah and Israel are cursed with their presence and gross depravity.
On Mar 1, 2002, the US National Archives released secret White House tape recordings of oral conversations in the White House. Included therewith was a conversation that President Richard Nixon had with Baptist Christian leader Billy Graham on Feb 1, 1972. The Chicago Tribune of Mar 1, 2002 had a story by James Warren which told what was said between Graham and Nixon that day (as detailed at this web site in Understanding Money and War XIII at the left menu herein).
Graham said the Jews had a stranglehold on America through the media (Graham spoke of the generic Jews whom he called Satanic; though ignorant Graham knew little or nothing that the Jews in European affairs for centuries has been the Khazars out of central Asia). Nixon agreed and they both further agreed that that hold needed to be broken. It was clear that poor Nixon harbored hopes of breaking that Satanic hold on America in his second term. Naturally, his feelings leaked out to the Khazars and they went to work to destroy him over some petty lies that almost all politicians tell routinely. And the sorry Graham later apologized to the Jews over his comments when the Nixon tapes were made public in 2002.
In any case, after the conversation with Graham, Nixon went on to tell his aide H. R. Haldeman's (per his diaries) that there was discussion with Graham "of the terrible problem arising from the total Jewish domination of the media, and agreement that this was something that would have to be dealt with. Graham has the strong feeling that the Bible says there are satanic Jews and there's where our problem arises."
Nixon also said: "We can't talk about it publicly," namely Jewish influence in Hollywood and the media. He cites Paul Keyes, a political conservative who is executive producer of the NBC hit, "Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In," as telling him that "11 of the 12 writers are Jewish." Graham says: "That right?" which prompted Nixon to claim that Life magazine, Newsweek, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and others, are "totally dominated by the Jews." Nixon called network TV anchors Howard K. Smith, David Brinkley and Walter Cronkite "front men who may not be of that persuasion," but that their writers are "95 percent Jewish."
Nixon also went on to tell Haldeman that “the Jews are irreligious, atheistic, immoral bunch of bastards.” That sums up Nixon’s feelings of the Jews (correctly the Khazars who rule America). Of course, Khazar Jew spies and agents in the White House communicated the Nixon position to the Khazar leadership and they went to work in their controlled media to destroy Nixon over the Watergate scandal.
In the Power of Prophecy newsletter (Vol. 2011-07B), Christian preacher Texe Marrs quoted various people who criticized the Jews (correctly the Khazars since the Khazars have essentially constituted European Jewry for many long centuries now) as follows: Communist founder Karl Marx (himself a Khazar Jew) said that the “God” of his fellow Jews was “Money” and that their religion was “cash” and “bill of credit.”
Marrs cited former President Harry Truman who took payoffs and bribes from Jews (and whose career with the Khazars goes back to Harry’s ties with the Kansas City mob of the 1920s and 1930s run by the Khazars at the top—ed). Truman said that they were selfish and when in power “neither Hitler or Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the underdog.”
In a citation from World Chess Grand Master Bobby Fischer (often called the greatest genius on planet earth), Marrs added that Fischer said that “America is totally under control of the Jews… They’re just unbelievably wicked, they’re a criminal people.”
From Lutheran Church founder Martin Luther— “They steal and mutilate our children, poison our water, curse us and thirst after our blood.” The writer and editor of this column herein will add a point on this citation from Luther. It was popularly believed by Europeans long ago that Jews steal White European children and offer them in blood sacrifices and especially at Passover time. I must say that while this charge could never be legitimately levied against the generic true Jews/truly religious Jews it is the real world out there in terms of the Khazar Jew pretenders involved in Satanism and Luciferianism, and especially as found among the super rich Khazar money changers/bankers. Child sacrifice is real world among these people (see also my comments below on “The Amalekite Khazars Lead Sex Sins with Sabbatianism (this section is omitted here in this presentation—ed).
To appreciate the Khazar evil, one must take another look at the Hebrew Old Testament (OT)—which is accepted by Muslims and Christians as well as Jews. The history of the Khazars reveals in the OT why they are so clannish and evil in their dealings with others. They stick together to jointly work full time against the so called goyim whom they passionately hate. As discussed above, these early writings fully explain their evil and why The CREATOR Himself has hated/opposed them for the past almost 4,000 years.
Thus, the Old Testament Prophets have views similar to those of Judaism on their genetic evil. Obadiah 1:2-5 has it that "Comparatively small in number, small in honor, not merely despised, but 'greatly despised;' arrogant, 'Who shall bring me down to the ground?;' notoriously ambitious for money and power, exalting themselves 'as an eagle;' and rapacious beyond all measure or mercy. Even gleaners of grapes would leave a few for others. But the greed of these people is insatiable. They covet all for themselves. These are the marks of Esau-Edom." (July 1999, "Destiny Editorial Letter"). For sure, the Edomites generally and the Amalekites particularly have to be the most evil people of all time.
Interestingly, many modern Jewish scholars are acutely aware of the Edomite linkage to modern Jewry and Judaism. Yes, intelligent Jews, who should have known better, allowed the genetically evil Amalekites to convert to Judaism over the years. Thus, “Encyclopaedia Judaica” (v. 6, p. 378) charges that the “Edomites became a section of the Jewish people,” and comments from "The Jewish Encyclopedia" (v. 5, p. 41 of the 1925 edition) recognize that "Edom is modern Jewry." Today, they comprise almost all of Ashkenazi Judaism (as proven by Arthur Koestler in the Thirteenth Tribe). What a shame it has been that a decent, respectable, Scriptural religion--like Orthodox Judaism--has been damaged with the conversion of the Amalekite serpents. For sure, one of the worse mistakes that true Jews have made in their entire history was to allow/accept the alleged conversion of the Amalekites to Judaism.
Summation of the British and American Crisis from the Khazars.
The Historical Review Press had a very provocative article on “The Hidden but Awkward Origins of World War 2, The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events” which tells the story on how the Khazar Amalekites have taken control of our lives and beings here in the early 21st century:
"Just consider the following: Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying ‘Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war’. (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129). Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says ‘Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.’ (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)
"Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, ‘the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.’ (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976). Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324). Is all of this merely attributable to terrible antisemitism? The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.
"At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H Nicholson Peacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that ‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.’ (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)). As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.
"According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144): ‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population. The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press – all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed – and lavishly displayed – by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.’ Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?
"Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, ‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’ But she adds ‘Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their ‘race’. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents.’ etc etc.
"Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. ‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein - they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’ (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).
"Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes ‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’
"Mowrer says ‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’ (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds ‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’ (pp. 144-5).
"Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: ‘I watched during the one-day boycott of Jewish shops the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word ‘Jew’, in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’ (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed’s book Disgrace Abounding of the following year he notes ‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’ (pp238-9).
"The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes ‘For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish.’ (Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984) p58. To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Palestine (1984) pp272-277). According to Black, ‘The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany was Samuel Untermeyer.’ (p 369). This was the culmination of a permanent worldwide boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was allegedly particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, however imposed in 1935 only, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah Arendt Eichmann in Jerusalem p 7).
"Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia's population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries.
"According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8): ‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin. To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’
"Other authors agree with this: ‘There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.’ (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23). The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s… Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in 'nice society', and 'nice society' included the universities.’ (Martin Bernal, Black Athena vol. 1 pp. 367, 387). ‘The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler's) anti-Semitic beliefs.’ (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).
"Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, ‘The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all’ (p.267), and ‘Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership’ (p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist ‘who took advantages whenever they offered themselves’ (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around.
"Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order: ‘He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the catholic Church – saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere.’ (p 200).
"According to Liddell Hart, ‘At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia’ (p140). David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to ‘the discovery. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.’
"This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.
"E-mail comment received: I worked and studied in Berlin for three years, have an MA in International Relations and a BA in Government with a minor in History. I am embarrassed to say that until I read this article, I had no idea of the scope and cause for the anti-Semitism in Germany before WWII. The Halt Order at Dunkirk was never mentioned in my studies, nor was the ownership of the media, banks and businesses.
"Thank you for the excellent article. It certainly gives me a new perspective. I have always questioned the actual numbers of Jewish victims of the concentration camps, as the numbers didn't make sense based upon Germany's population. Perhaps it was fear of failing or being labeled an anti-Semite by my history professors (all but two were Jewish) and classmates that I refrained from demanding an honest discussion during my classes. I once said that the only reason Israel existed was out of Holocaust guilt, and I was immediately labeled a terrorist sympathizer. I see what is now happening in Israel and I am aghast. The parallels to WW II are frightening. Even today, one cannot bring up this subject without being labeled a Holocaust denier or white supremacist."
Though only one percent of the population, the Khazars controlled Germany and was the source of the sickness, suffering and evil in the nation before 1933. The exact same situation prevails today in America and Britain. What happened? In the Middle Ages and early years of the Protestant Revolution, Amalekite Khazars out of Asia and speaking Yiddish showed up in Germany. The stupid German people greeted them and gave them citizenship, the German language and German names and many intermarried with them since they soon became the power brokers in Germany with money. Soon, they took over Germany and destroyed its historical relevance in WWII (they did the exact same thing with Russia in 1917). And since WWII, the Khazars have flooded Germany with Blacks from Africa, Muslim Turks, etc which will destroy the historic German people forever.
We are doing the same in America and we too will be destroyed thanks to the Khazars we allowed in who have over the years taken over our nation. While some few of them have been good citizens and made useful contributions to the nation, most have not. They have given us most of the high level crime; Hollywood with all its depravity and evil taught to our people; poverty; and the sickness of the petro chemical industry with plastics, chemical fertilizers and pesticides, etc, etc.
Today, if you try to call some business and certainly the government, you will get a telephone recording and you will have to struggle for long minutes to try to find a person to talk with. If you have success, you will finally find yourself talking to someone in India or South America who speaks broken English. You may or may not succeed. And why? Well, we can thank the Khazars who rule Wall Street and who allowed their worthless prostitute politicians to price our labor market out of business. The Khazars then used technology to replace American workers to answer phones. Failing the use of technology (recorded telephone messages), the mostly Khazar directors of the American corporations have merely transferred the remaining need for a live person to talk with to some overseas destination. So today, we have one in seven on food stamps and unemployment among millions of Americans. And we face a total and complete bankruptcy.
Just like the Khazars manipulated the economy and markets to take over most of the wealth in Germany by 1932, they have been doing the precise same thing in the US by 2011. They now own most of the wealth of the US (not all of it, but certainly most of it). And just like they brought on riots and anarchy, and a dictator to restore law and order in Germany, and then WWII to really achieve their hearts desires; we can bank on it that history does repeat itself. What happened to Germany is on the drawing boards to happen to the US. And we can thank our ancestors for stupidly allowing these persons in to take over our nation. Please understand that I am not talking about true, good, religious, Sephardic people who are worlds apart from the Khazar masters--like the Rothschilds, Roggenfelders, Oppenheimers, Lazards, Schiffs, Warburgs, Kuhns, Loebs, etc.
The good Jew Barry Goldwater (who I voted for in 1964) was a far different man than the so-called Christian Khazar Roggenfelders who are the epitome of evil. So how can I now be accused of anti Semitism? As a general rule, religious Jews are pretty good people; but the Khazar Satanists/Luciferians (though they claim to be Christians or Jews) are generally the epitome of evil. They are the primary purveyors of immorality, sickness and depravity on shown in vice and criminal activities.
While Blacks are usually the cheap street criminals and the pimps pimping white whores (many very innocent and helpless women are thrust into whoredom because of poverty and outright crooked operations of Khazar Jew owners of their lives), you can bank on it that a Khazar Jew is running crime at the top. Yes, Khazar Arnold Rothstein set up Khazar control over organized crime in the 1920s. Khazar Meyer Lansky was the boss of all crime bosses from 1935 to his death in 1983. Today, we hear a lot about crime boss John Gotti, Jr. But what few realize is that his mother was a Khazar Jewess. So Gotti was a Khazar Jew despite his Sicilian name.
As was true in Germany, much or almost all of the media, the law profession, the educators in colleges and universities, the state approved medical profession and similar professions are in the hands of the Khazars. Almost all key supervisory positions in the US government and in large corporations are in the hands of Khazars. And since they took over the law profession and courts (not 100%, but certainly the majority), they have brought sickness to the US courts. That’s why there is little chance of finding justice in today’s US courts.
And that’s why we have the stupidity in the medical profession that a little radiation won’t hurt us. Well, they said that about asbestos years ago. And that’s why we are never taught about healthful living to prevent sickness and disease and instead we are taught to stupidly abuse our bodies and lives with the only recourse the Khazar approved medical profession with their drugs and surgery. Anyone else trying to cut in on their profits will be arrested for practicing medicine without a license and will go to jail. At most, the Khazars constitute about 1% of the US population; but they control almost all positions of power in America today in both the US government and the large corporations.
The Amalekite Destroyers.
There is no need to recount the horrors that the Amalekites imposed on the unified nation of Israel at the time of the Exodus from Egypt and thereafter over the years that Israel existed and divided into the Houses of Israel and Judah. But there were some key events starting to take place in the 6th century BCE which has impacted upon world history more so than any other thing. This backdrop will lay the foundation for the world to come to believe that the evil Amalekite Khazars are of Judah/Jews when, in fact, they are not.
History does reveal to the student of truth the great evil of the Amalekites and how they have brought enormous hurt, harm, destruction and death to the various nations and peoples that have stupidly allowed them to immigrate into those nations. Perhaps the best illustration of all of the Amalekite evil and depravity started to happen to the true Jewish people when the Davidic kingdom in Judea fell to the invading Babylonians in the 6th century BCE (though the Amalekites may have earlier played a role in the Assyrian conquests of the House of Israel in 8th-7th centuries BCE).
History has recorded and most people have come to believe that the invading Babylonians into Jerusalem in c554 BCE are to be credited with the destruction of the First Jewish Temple (built by Solomon) and the carnage, rape, plunder, death and destruction put on the House of Judah at that time. But what few people understand is that the Babylonian army was accompanied by a band of Amalekite carpetbaggers which had allied with the Babylonians against the Judeans (“Soncino Books of the Bible,” p. 98, the Five Megilloth).
Actually, there are a host of Scriptures and Apocrypha writings which build the case that it was the evil Amalekites who plundered, burned and destroyed the First Temple (Ps 137:7; Lam 4:21-22; Oba 1:10-16; I Esdras 4:44-46; Enoch 89:66). Thus, much of historic Judaism has come to believe that it was the Amalekites who burned and destroyed the First Temple. Knowing their propensity for evil and money, it is not hard to see that they stole some of the Temple treasuries as well. Likewise, along with the Babylonians, we can bank on it that the Amalekite carpetbaggers were busy plundering, murdering and stealing everything possible in Jerusalem at that time. This tragic event is described in some detail in the book of Lamentations and in chapter 145 of volume 10 on the Jewish Paradox at Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment on the Good News People (at age-end.com).
As we also know from history, the territory of Judah was vacated for awhile following the Babylonian deportation of the people of Judah. But in those 70 years of Babylonian exile, another tragic and profoundly important event took place to further the great hurt that the Amalekites would soon put on the world. With Judea largely vacant, Amalekite usurpers began swarming into Judea from their desert homelands in the south. Some of them stole the land of Judah and settled as far north as Jerusalem and Samaria (thus, some of them became Samaritans by the time of Simon Magus [Acts 8:9] who was an Amalekite Samaritan).
This takes us to the Jewish return to Judea where the true Jews commenced rebuilding the Temple. The books of Ezra and Nehemiah describe what happened. The people of the land (who had settled in Judea following the Jewish exile) came and tried to join the rebuilding of the Temple and commenced a process of intermarrying and mixing with the true Jews. But the true Jewish leaders nipped both efforts in the bud. They rejected Samaritan participation in the work on the Temple and Ezra in time prompted the true Jews to get rid of their nokri-nekar wives and children. Over the years, these Samaritans harassed and worked against the people of Judah. Hence, the Temple work lay dormant for about 30 years before the process recommenced.
But while few historians have grasped the situation in Judea on the Jewish return, the truth is that this band of Samaritan trouble makers must have included some number of Amalekites (as documented in vol 10 of Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People at age-end.com). Another curious little fact that few historians have picked upon was that these Samaritans (to include many Amalekite Samaritans) tried to integrate with the true Jews. In other words, at that early time, they were trying to become Jews. But Ezra laid down YHWH’s law and stopped this evil effort.
While the Amalekites never fared well under the rule of the Medes and Persians, they did successfully link in with the Greeks during Grecian rule from the 4th to 1st centuries BCE. Thus, by the time of the Maccabees, the wicked Amalekites had sided with the Seleucids against the Jewish Israelites (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 6, p. 378). Hence, they probably had some role in the desecration of the Temple at the hands of the Seleucids, although it is not clear what role.
But with the Jewish recovery of the Temple and the rededication of the altar and true worship on Moriah (at Hanukkah), true Jews were able to subdue the Amalekites. Judas Maccabees made war on them in Idumea because they had hemmed the Jews in and he remembered how the Baeanites (certain Amalekites?) had set traps and road blocks to ambush the Jewish Israelites (I Macc 5:3-4). Judas also fought them at Hebron (I Macc 5:65).
By the time of John Hyrcanus (2nd century BCE), the next tragic and pathetic part of this story takes place when the Jewish leader Hyrcanus invaded the territory of Edom in the south (at least upper Idumea) and decided to forcibly convert some of the Edomites (correctly Amalekites) to Judaism. At last, some of the Amalekites were being integrated into a part of Judah. This takes us to Roman rule in the 1st century BCE. Herod’s father linked in with the Romans and soon Herod the Great had engineered himself into being appointed by the Romans as the King over much of Canaan land (with the help of the Amalekite bankers who had taken over much of the Roman Empire—see vol 23, Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People at age-end.com).
In late Second Temple days, Josephus mentioned the role that the Edomites played in promoting and agitating the war with Rome which spelled out the next destruction of the Temple and the then end of the Jewish presence in Palestine. This evil work by the Amalekites is discussed in vol 10 of Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People (at age-end.com) and particularly in the context of their linkage with the so called Zealots.
Just as the Amalekites seem to have been the people who destroyed the First Temple in earlier days, the same thing seems to have occurred in the Jewish-Roman war. While the Romans, under Titus, get credit for destroying the Second Temple in 70 CE, the Aug 2001 “End Time News” (p. 4) offered some evidence that the Amalekites themselves were also involved. This source quoted Second Baruch 6:3-7 and a Hebrew version of Josephus (“Josippon,” as quoted in “Mimekor Israel”), both of which suggested that the area of the inner Temple was set on fire by Jews, themselves, just before the end. Since the Amalekites controlled the Temple at the end, it would seem that they set at least one or more of the fires which ultimately destroyed the Temple.
With the fall of Jerusalem to the Romans (because of the war created by the Amalekites), some of the evil Amalekites must have died in that war along with numbers of true Jews. This then brings into play the above presentation on how many of these evil Amalekites fled into central Asia to the old land area of Ashkenaz (modern Georgia) where they became Yiddish Khazars, as discussed above. By the Protestant Reformation, they had spread heavily into Russia and further West into Western Europe. With the English colonization of North America, they arrived in North America to commence their destruction of the nations developing in North America.
Yet, wherever these evil Amalekites fled, it was always the same story. They came to change their names and adopt parts of the local culture and religion in order to launch a subversive campaign to steal the money of their benefactress and gain monetary rulership in order to make the local people serfs and slaves subservient to them. They did this by the 17th century in Russia. Well, the ruling Czars saw in them a subversive fifth column out to remove the imperial rule and substitute their rule and enslavement of the Russian people.
This situation prompted the beginning of a so called persecution against the Amalekite Khazars, now pretending to be Jews. By 1717, in the days of Catherine the Great, a large land area in Western Russia and what would later be called Eastern Poland was set aside for these Khazar Jews as the Pale. Russia tried to force them out of Russia proper and make them settle in the Pale. The Khazars passionately hated the family of the Czars for what they were trying to do in order to save the Russian people from these parasite snakes. This began the work of the Khazars to take over Russia and destroy the ruling Czars (the Khazars murdered the Czar and his family).
As was happening in Russia, Poland and Germany, involving a Khazar Jew takeover of those nations, the same thing was underway in France. While old King Louie stupidly allowed them into France, he was not anxious to turn France over to them to fully exploit. So they promoted the great French inflation binge and depression in the 1790s. Using their Illuminati agents, they then brought on the French Revolution of the 1790s and the murder of Louie and many other French leaders. This resulted in the rise of Napoleon and the complete Khazar takeover of France (which they rule to this day in 2011).
In the meantime, one of the Khazars named Alexander Levine (who used the alias Hamilton) linked in with George Washington to begin the infiltration and Khazar takeover of the United States. They were the primary people responsible for the US Civil War.
In writings on the super rich Amalek-Edomite bankers in the Understanding Money and War series, at this web site, the same phenomenon as happened with the Amalekite carpetbaggers following the Babylonians repeats itself as the modern Amalekite bankers (Rothschilds, Lazards, Warburgs, Oppenheimers, Roggenfelders, etc) use the various armies of the world to inflict punishment and hurt on nations around the globe. Whenever a particular nation is crushed militarily, it allows these super rich Amalekite bankers to rush in to exploit and plunder the wealth of the defeated nation.
In the American Civil War, General U.S. Grant lamented about how some of these same people followed his army into the US Southern states--as carpetbaggers to plunder, steal and exploit whatever property they could. Grant was very critical of these wicked (Amalekite) Jews and left written records to state his displeasure over their wickedness.
In General Order No. 11, dated Dec 17, 1862, he expelled Jews from his command and area of operations by describing them “as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department” (Dec 22, 2000, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 23). This order expelled all Jews (correctly Amalekites, ed) from the Cumberland area of Tennessee and Kentucky. Furthermore, Grant forbade those people from going south and even issued orders for train conductors to not allow them to get on board trains (Jan-Mar 2001 “Petah Tikvah,” p. 14).
Apparently, these Amalekite parasites followed Grant’s army around to steal and plunder (just as they did when they followed the Babylonian army into defeated Jerusalem in c554 BCE, as noted above). Later, the supposedly loving and kind Abraham Lincoln revoked Grant’s orders.
This takes us back to the situation in Russia where a subversive Khazar fifth column work was underway to take over the nation by the turn of the 20th century. As discussed elsewhere herein, they succeeded in 1917 with the Russian Revolution. Again, the Khazars murdered the Russian rulers and imposed a reign of terror on the people with the Khazar invented Communism. Khazar leaders like Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, etc took over Russia. Only slowly, over time, were Russian nationalists able to break the Khazar rule over Russia.
Meanwhile, they were also busy in Germany, making plans and preparations to destroy that nation as they did when a group of Khazar leaders (named Shicklgruber, Stalin, Churchill and Rosenfeldt) started WWII to murder up to thirty million people (including some good and bad Jews, but certainly not six million as they have lied about to the world).
Today, these same evil parasites are making plans and preparations to destroy the remnant of the House of Israel found in the United States and White British Commonwealth. Right now, they are planning and will soon execute WWIII with an Eastern combine from China, Russia, and much of the Middle East and Latin America. This time, it will be the US and White British Commonwealth which will bite the dust and be destroyed.
The Amalekite Khazars Lead Sex Sins with Sabbatianism.
Incidentally, the sins of miscegenation/homosexuality/sodomy have gained respectability across the Houses of Israel and Judah here in the age-end because of the work of the influential and ruling Khazars who promote these sins. While the goy Israelites themselves can be extremely depraved and evil, they have allowed the Amalekite Khazars to come in and take over their nations (Ezek 35:10). Historically, these Amalekites were tied to sodomy and evil in general (thus, in today's world, the Khazars are often tied to homosexuality/lesbianism/generic depravity and wickedness).
Since the 17th century, the Khazars have collectively promoted a very sexually depraved, mystical philosophy called Sabbatianism. This demented effort came on the world scene because of the work of a clever, diabolical, Khazar Jew named Shabbetai Zevi (1626-1676) in the old Ottoman Empire (see v. 29 of Ezekiel and YHWH's Judgment for the Good News People at age-end.com). While this man’s name and his movement are close in pronunciation to the Hebrew word Shabbat, the two ideas are totally different and have absolutely nothing in common.
This backdrop brings up a most fascinating book by R. Marvin S. Antelman, on “To Eliminate the Opiate,” published in Jerusalem by the Zionist Book Club. In it, Rav Antelman seems to bring most of the sources of evil together in the world today into some sense of understanding. He outlines a common thread that appears to tie all or most all of them to Zevi's work and the resulting philosophy of Sabbatianism.
Specifically, Antelman ties the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Bronfmans, Henry Kissinger, and other workers of evil to Sabbatianism--to include all forms of Internationalism (or Globalism), Communism, Socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Humanism, Rosicrucianism, the mother-earth religion, the brotherhood of man, racial amalgamation (through integration and miscegenation), sexual permissiveness and licentiousness, homosexuality, feminism, the destruction of the family, the British Round Table Groups, the Rhodes Trust (that funds and promotes the so-called international scholarship program at Oxford which produces people known as Rhodes scholars), the Skull and Bones Society, the US Council on Foreign Relations, the Illuminati, the Mafia, the liberal (non-fundamentalist) Christian Churches (which consists of almost all of the Christian Churches in today’s modern world), Neoplatonism, Christian Gnosticism, anti-Torah advocates of all forms (which again includes almost the totality of Christianity), Reform Judaism, Reconstructionist Judaism, Kabbalists, B’nai B’rith (to include its organic Anti-Defamation League), the Jewish Defense League, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Satanists, New Agers, Occultists of all forms, the United Nations, promoters of the “Learned Elders of Zion” (or Sion, as Messianic Jew Len Horowitz of Sagle, Idaho suggests), and on and on?
To the above list, this writer would just add that it can be essentially reduced to the simple explanation that they all involve the Amalekite Khazars. Because the Amalekites are the leaders and effective owners of the Israel nations, as discussed above, they have led the way in Sabbatian depravity.
Of course, many of the stupid, gullible Israelites have followed the Amalekite queer leadership and adopted the most gross forms of sexual depravity conceivable--to include homosexuality, interracial sex, pedophile sex (the slogan is get them before eight or its too late), etc. In particular, Sabbatianism promotes wife swapping and teaches that the greatest joy for an Israelite man is to see his wife copulating with a Negro male. Here, in the age-end, there are Internet web sites that teach that White men can get sexual joy by masturbating while their wives have sex with a Black(s) with them watching.
There is clearly an evil satanic/demonic spirit present (working with the Khazar Jews) which is tragically promoting the desire in Whites to miscegenate with Blacks. Stupid White women in particular are affected by this adverse spiritual power and many succumb to its evil (and many are known to pay Blacks money to have sex with them; per Malachi 83 at Covenant People's Ministry Forum). The Khazars are also known to be promoting sex between humans/humanoids and dogs, horses, donkeys, etc. The Khazars completely run the porn business, to include the tragic snuff movies (where live murders take place on film).
Exodus 17:8-16 and Deuteronomy 25:17-19 discuss the Amalekite attack on Israel during the Exodus (as cited above). Piska 3 from “Pesikta De-Rab Kahana” (p. 38) addressed this terrible event and reported that in Amalek’s first attack on Israel during the Exodus, Amalek lured Israelites from their camp so that they would be killed and polluted by pederasty. While details of these sexual perversions upon Israelites do not seem to be available, a little logic can crystallize the possibilities. Perhaps the Amalekites engaged in sodomy with helpless captured Israelites or sodomized their dead corpses in some manner.
For a Scriptural basis on how the Amalekites tried to pollute Yisrael with pederasty, Piska 3 notes the words “How he met thee by the way” (Deut 25:18), which come from the Hebrew krk (kyrk). This reference is elsewhere used in the Torah in the situation where a man has a nocturnal emission of semen which makes him unclean, necessitating that he leave the camp (Deut 23:10-11). R. Judah interpreted “krk” as meaning “he befouled thee with his (Amalek’s) semen (by subjecting thee to sodomy).” In other words, Judah did not see the problem with the Amalekites as being nocturnal emissions; but rather, as being one of sodomy as practiced by the Amalekites upon the Israelites (“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” p. 51-52).
The gist of this is that there are some possible Scriptural reasons suggesting that very early in the history of the Amalekites, they had a record of sodomy in their ranks. Also, the evidence seems to be that they tried to teach or impose their sodomite practices on some of the gullible, stupid Israelites (which they are still doing today). It must be important to note that the Amalekites, and perhaps some of their Canaanite friends and relatives, dwelt in the Rift vale or valley (Hebrew “emeq”), evidently South of the Dead Sea (Num 14:25). The Scriptures use this same Hebrew word to describe the place of dwelling of the Sodomites in Avraham’s day (Gen 14:3-17).
Actually, the vale involved with the Sodomites was apparently at the Southern or Southeastern edge of the Dead Sea. It appears that some of the Amalekites lived in this same precise area which was probably a part of the greater definition of Edom. Is it not significant that the Amalekites inhabited the same area where the homosexual fags lived in Sodom and Gomorrah? Yes, it seems like it is!
In modern 20th century Satanism and other occult activities, sexual rituals are often associated with human murder and sacrifice (as briefly noted above). Ezekiel and YHWH's Judgment for the Good News People (v. 29) focuses on some of these on-going activities as promoted by the Khazars. Suffice to say, Satan’s Amalek-Edomite descendants are very prone for any type of sodomite perversion that can surface as a part of their murdering and killing of Israelites.
Jewish Orthodox writer Yair Davidy (in BritAm.org Number 1737) had some remarks on Amalek from Jewish “Rabbi Nathan.” Per this report, Amalek is the Archenemy of Israel and “bears the aspect of sexual immorality.” Per Nathan, “This is called ‘Pegem Habrit’ (impairment of the covenant) because it weakens the bond or covenant between Israel and the Almighty.”
This Yair Davidy citation make the case that “In one sense the Dispersion (of Israel from the land of ancient land of Canaan) was due to the impairment of the covenant or sexual immorality and its rectification is the responsibility of the Camp of Dan.” This thinking raises the prospect that the tribe of Dan (thought by some to be Israelites who mixed with Phoenician Catholics to form the modern Irish people) was someway responsible for some part of the immorality present in Israel (in the sealing of the 144,000 in Rev 7, Dan is mysteriously absent in the blessing).
Since most of the Amalekite Sabbatians are Satanists (per Antelman) or Luciferians (as noted above, Albert Pike's book on Morals and Dogma explains that the Illuminati masters/Khazars worship Lucifer, thus Luciferians), they are leading the way in this evil in the age-end. And if R. Nathan's remarks are valid, the tribe of Dan may be contributing to this Amalekite Khazar immorality in some way.
Please understand that the Amalekite Khazar snakes do not publicly let on that they are Satanists/Luciferians. They are secret Satanists/Luciferians; pretending to be Christians and Jews publicly (on this, see Rev 2:9 and 3:9). The Khazar Jew Howard Stanton Levey (1930-1997) was one of the few exceptions. Howard used the alias Anton LeVey as he founded the Church of Satan in San Francisco in 1966. He was a classic Satanist in public.
The Sephardi Jews Versus the Ashkenazi Khazars
While most religious Jews in Israel are Sephardim and are true Jews, most Ashkenazim are not religious Jews (they are either atheists or Satanists/Luciferians); and in fact, they are not even Jews at all (yet while most Amalekite Khazars are not religious Jews and probably can't be with their depraved Amalekite genes, some few Ashkenazi Jews with mixed Khazar and true Jewish ancestry can be--per Deut 23:7-8). In the main, many of the Jewish religious people who came to Khazaria in the 8th century CE to try to teach the depraved Khazars some morality stayed and evidently sired many or most of today's few religious (observant) Ashkenazi Jews.
While the Sephardic definition has come to represent non-Ashkenazi Jews in general, it must be said that technically only the Jews of ancient Spain and Portugal were Sephardim. The word Sephardic is believed to be derived from the Hebrew Sepharad used at Obadiah 1:20 and thought to refer to the ancient land area of Hispania--Iberia (Encyclopaedia Judaica, v. 14, p. 1164). It is also clear that the word also links in some fashion to Sepharvaim, a city in ancient Babylon (II Kg 17:24; 18:34; 19:13; Isa 36:19). These Sepharvaim (actually Cushites) were likely the first settlers of Hispania-Iberia as well as parts of later Italy.
Israelites were believed to also have come to Sepharad at an early time. By the 1st century CE, Jewish synagogues were there. But the character of the people there changed with the Berber-Moor invasion of c711 CE. The Berbers were the ancient Philistines of Canaan. They had mixed with Jews in Palestine over the years and by 711 CE it was believed that one tribe of the Berbers, the Jerawa, were reported to be religious Jews (Overlords of Chaos.com). So even the historic Sephardim in Spain had some illegal mixtures. As a minimum, the invading Berbers killed many of the Cushite and Jewish men and copulated with the women to put their imprint on the people of Hispania to modern times.
But beyond the Sephardim of Spain, there are other important groups of Jews in the modern state of Israel. The best definition of modern, truly religious Jews and people who practice the most Scriptural version of Judaism is the Oriental Jews (also known as Mizrahi Jews) who go back to 1st Temple days when they left Palestine. Old Babylon became the center of religious Judaism with the fall of Jerusalem in c554 BCE. These Oriental Jews today in Israel are led by the very respected Jewish authority, Rav Ovadia Yosef. In Israel they are culturally, socially and politically known as the Ultra Orthodox Shas. Interestingly, in Israel, the ruling Ashkenazi Jews discriminate against and often hate, oppress and oppose the true Jews, like the Shas.
There are other Sephardic Jewish groups like the Falashas of Ethiopia and the Cochin-Shinlung-bene Israel of India. But the Falashas and Indian Jews are not true Jews racially, culturally or religiously (though some of them may have had some small presence of Jewish ancestry, along with Cushite ancestry). Thus, in modern Israel, the true Jews and most religious Jews of all are primarily Oriental Jews, now largely in the Shas definition. It has been and will be these people who likely will provide the true liturgy and hope for a pure version of Judaism by the time YESHUA returns.
It is grossly unfair to try to lump the good Jews of the Sephardic classification in with the evil, Satanic, Ashkenazi, Amalekite Khazars as most ignorant and uninformed people try to do. They are totally different people and function with a completely different mindset. To demonstrate the contrast, one of the key historic people who greatly contributed to an understanding of truth, righteousness and the age-end congregation of Philadelphia was Reuben H. Sawyer, a Disciples of Christ preacher, who was a leader in the Oregon Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s and a founding member of the British Israel World Federation. He linked these three ideas together and preached to thousands in the Pacific US Northwest from 1919 to about 1937.
In a section on Who Are the Jews, in a small 1925 booklet on "The Jewish Question," Sawyer applauded the Sephardic Jews for having "contributed some of the most honoured leaders to the great nations of the world while the Ashkenazim Jew has been a constant menace to every country into which he has trust his unwelcome presence." He compared the Sephardim to the good figs of Jeremiah 24:2-3 and the Ashkenazim to the "very naughty figs." He reminded his readers that to his day there were large numbers of so called Jews in the world who were not of the Hebrew race (as cited by Jewish writer Robert Singerman, in his article on "Contemporary Racist and Judeophobic Ideology Discovers the Khazars").
The End.
____________________________________________________________________
Besides the revelations contained above, the work of the plutocratic financial market manipulators to conspiratorially manipulate and control the financial markets (to make more profits and install a world government under their management) is also addressed at length in the periodic analysis of the news and in other articles produced at www.analysis-news.com. This website has an article of interest to any person interested in understanding the market Manipulators. It is the Hidden Secret of the Manipulators, why they succeed and how to follow their manipulations.
Readers of the above article are invited to become a subscriber to Analysis of News (see How to Subscribe in the left menu herein) to regularly read some of the material from the world of information which will further reveal how extensive the manipulation, control and dishonesty realities are in the financial, currency and commodity markets, not only in the US but indeed around the world.
Comments
Post a Comment