Prison or the Presidency? Hillary’s Remaining Options
Prison or the Presidency? Hillary’s Remaining Options
Monday, November 28, 2016 6:21
On November 9th, in the early morning hours, I reported that Donald Trump had made a deal with the devil and had agreed to not prosecute Hillary Clinton. When Trump clinched Pennsylvania, it was clear that Clinton could not win, as the story goes, Podesta, “the Pizza man”, reached out to Trump’s Senior Advisor, Kellyanne Conway, and offered to not contest the close results in exchange for a promise to not prosecute Clinton.
While the offer was being mulled over by the Trump insiders, Podesta delivered what was thought to be a concession speech to the nation. Yet, Hillary was nowhere to be found and it was anything but a concession speech. In fact, Podesta said, no decision had been made.. and we could be counting votes for a very long time….” Shortly after that speech, Trump agreed to not prosecute and Clinton agreed to concede the next day. In fact, Trump told 60 minutes in a pre-recorded interview just over 48 hours later that “He did not not want to hurt the Clintons”, meaning that he was going to live up this bargain and not prosecute Hillary. Case closed, right? Donald Trump is President and his path to the White House is unopposed. Nothing could be further from the truth.
It was clear that Clinton would not oppose the election results.
Unfortunately, Clinton’s word means nothing.
Clinton and Stein Reach a Deal
Based on insider information I received, I was among the first to report that Jill Stein was opposing the election results in three states. This candidate, from an obscure party that millions of American have never heard of, announced her intent to challenge the election results despite having only garnered one percent of the vote. I was also told that Stein was promised either the Department of the Interior or the head of the EPA. I reported on this several days ago.
The problem for Stein is that she does not have standing in all three states from which to challenge the results because her vote total was so low. Enter the mater-minds, the Clinton people. They do have standing although without major fraud, Clinton basically has no chance to overturn the election. However, there are a couple of anomalies that bother me. Stein could barely raise $1 million for her campaign, but for a recall, she was able to raise nearly $5 million. Where did the money come from? Everyone and their mother would answer in unison, “George Soros”. And so the recount continues with this unholy arrangement.
Trump Declares War On Clinton: All Deals Are Off
Trump Senior Adviser Kellyanne Conway delivered a threat to prosecute Hillary Clinton if she pursues the recount during an interview on CNN’s State Of The Union.
“…he said he wouldn’t rule it out. He said it’s just not his focus right now. I think he’s being quite magnanimous and at the same time he’s not undercutting at all the authority and the autonomy of the Department of Justice, of the FBI, of the House Committees, who knows where the evidence may lead if, in fact, it were… if the investigation were re-opened somewhere...”“…you know, I was asked on CNN and elsewhere, goodness a thousand times, will Donald Trump accept the election results? And now you’ve got the Democrats and Jill Stein saying they do not accept the election results. She congratulated him and conceded to him on election night. I was right there. And the idea that we are going to drag this out now where the president-elect has been incredibly magnanimous to the Clintons and to the Obamas is incredible…”
If Donald Trump hangs onto his victory, Hillary Clinton wills surely be prosecuted.
It is all or nothing for Hillary. It is going to be the President or Prison for the former First Lady. In fact, she could be the first lady, or even the first man to go to prison after running for President.
Surely Clinton has a fall back position. IT would be foolish to risk everything on a long-shot recount effort. What does she have up her sleeve?
From my perspective and having watched this unfold from the beginning, Hillary has two options if she wasnt to avoid jail time:
- The assassination card will be played and Pence, a poor man’s globalist anyway, will be intimidate into giving the globalists what they want. It will be a case of LBJ’s cooperation following the death of JFK. Although this is a possibility, I still rate the assassination option to be a long shot at this time.
- She can play the terrorist card and disrupt America to the point where the country goes under martial law and there is no orderly transition of power. Does Clinton really have the ability and reach to pull of such an event.
The Terrorist Option
In previous articles, I detailed how the Clinton Foundation brokered arms deals with known state-sponsored terrorist countries as illustrated by the following graphic.
A person with these kinds of business connections can orchestrate a TET offensive inside the United States.
On these points, I want to be very clear. The abovementioned countries are not just Clinton Foundation donors, they are states that sponsor terrorism, with their allies ranging from the Muslim Brotherhood to ISIS.
I have mentioned on several occasions that FBI Director, James Comey, stated on July 4, 2016, that there are ISIS terrorist cells located in all 50 states. So what, the unenlightened may say. Clinton has proven that she can move the ISIS needle. How do I know that?
As previously reported on The Common Sense Show, I reported that while serving as member of the Board of Directors of LaFarge, Clinton oversaw the payout of seed funds with regard to the formation of ISIS. In two interviews on The Common Sense Show, former ARSOF, Scott Bennett detailed how money changed hands between Clinton interests and ISIS which used several foreign bank accounts.
I reported a year ago, that the United States was being set up for an ISIS attack of monumental proportions and I likened it to a modern day TET Offensive. Even before that I reported that a source within the Texas Rangers told me that their intelligence said the exact same thing. The latter article was printed in May of 2015.
In furtherance of this notion, I have previously reported, on several occasions that the Obama administration had been staffed with people with Muslim Brotherhood ties so the facilitation of such an attack could receive insider assistance. In fact, in February of 2015, I reported that several people with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood were occupying key positions within the Obama administration. And it has been widely reported that Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, had the same Muslim Brotherhood connections. It also well known that the President’s half brother, Malik Obama is in charge of the Muslim Brotherhood’s arms procurement and finances. I reported on this connection in 2014. I still maintain that Chicago will play a predominate role in the coming ISIS Tet Offensive. I first reported on this in 2013 when I maintained that Rahm Emanuel, a Mossad operative, illegally left the Obama administration to illegally become the mayor of Chicago. This connection was exacerbated with the murder of Jeff Joe Black, after Black made the same allegations on my radio show.
Conclusion
On the surface, Hillary Clinton appears to be playing a game of chicken with the recount. If she fails, she appears to be headed for prison. However, as I have painstakingly detailed here, Clinton has two major options left, assassination of Trump and throwing the country into chaos with her terrorist connections.
We will not have long to wait to see which way this crisis will head.
Comments
Post a Comment